Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Westwood Endowment Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
12
States reached
$231k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192021.

International$2.5MReligion$1.0MCrime & Legal$561kHealth$534kCommunity Improvement$512kPhilanthropy$470kEducation$260kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.6M
$150,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN$231,403
4AFRICA$231,403
PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL$231,402
SEED EFFECT$221,402
GLOBAL TRUST PARTNERS$213,102
THE SINAPIS GROUP$186,905
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$150,000
KIJABE CHILDRENS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC$56,403
MACLELLAN CENTER FOR GLOBAL CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC DBA GENEROSITY PATH$50,000
LIFE IN ABUNDANCE INTERNATIONAL$50,000
CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL$15,000
DALIT FREEDOM FUND$15,000
AGAPE CHILDRENS MINISTRY$10,000
HOPE WALKS$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 13 repeat orgs$844k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$4.6M
$804k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
-11%

Still filing today

92%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21
InternationalReligionEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 4
    4AFRICA
    3× · 2019–2021 · $631k · revenue +91%
  • PF
    PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2019–2021 · $561k · revenue +125%
  • SE
    SEED EFFECT
    3× · 2019–2021 · $536k · revenue +220%

Funded once

  • TV
    THE VERITAS FORUM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $180k · revenue +65%
  • DA
    Development Assoc International
    one grant, 2019 · $70k · revenue +8%
  • CI
    CONGO INITIATIVE USA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $70k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
3
Kidz At Heart International

KidZ at Heart International is a global Christian community that trains, partners with, and mobilizes networks of leaders to help children fall deeply in love with Jesus. We train and partner with churches and families to successfully…

Religion
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

8
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

9
CrossTalk Global

CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…

Religion
10
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
11
Partnership for Indigenous Peoples -Pipes - International

We are a global Christian organization committed to partnering with indigenous peoples, local churches, and community-based organizations to make disciples of Jesus Christ and help end extreme poverty. We serve indigenous pygmies,…

International
12
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life in Abundance International and the most unlike its peers is Prison Fellowship International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%29%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

4AFRICA — $631,403 · International4AFRICASEED EFFECT — $536,402 · InternationalSEED EFFECTMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $400,000 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONALWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $245,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION …KIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC — $181,403 · InternationalKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INCHOPE WALKS INC — $116,571 · International+2 more — $105,000 · InternationalKUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN — $534,403 · EducationKUPENDA FOR THE CHILDR…SINAPIS GROUP INC — $511,905 · EducationSINAPIS GROUP INCCONGO INITIATIVE USA INC — $70,000 · EducationCONGO INITIATIVE USA I…MIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH — $50,000 · EducationGlobal Trust Partners — $488,102 · ReligionGlobal Trust Partner…THE VERITAS FORUM INC — $180,000 · ReligionTHE VERITAS FORUM IN…LIFE IN ABUNDANCE INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 · ReligionLIFE IN ABUNDANCE IN…Children of Character Inc — $75,000 · ReligionChildren of Characte…Development Assoc International — $70,000 · ReligionDevelopment Assoc In…NORTH AMERICA MAINLAND CHINESE MISSION — $70,000 · ReligionNORTH AMERICA MAINLA…+2 more — $35,000 · ReligionPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL — $561,402 · Crime & LegalPRISON FEL…CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $470,163 · PhilanthropyCHATTANOO…MACLELLAN CENTER FOR GLOBAL CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC DBA GENEROSITY PATH — $145,000 · OtherVSI DBA VILLAGE SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL — $60,000 · OtherBILD-INTERNATIONAL — $45,000 · OtherBRENTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH — $40,000 · OtherFORGOTTEN VOICES INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · OtherDALIT FREEDOM FUND — $15,000 · OtherLIFEWATER INC — $53,975 · EnvironmentCHRISTS HOPE U S A INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC — $10,000 · Human Services
International$2,215,779Education$1,166,308Religion$1,068,102Crime & Legal$561,402Philanthropy$470,163Other$330,000Environment$53,975Human Services$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget4AFRICA — $631,403 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL — $561,402 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSEED EFFECT — $536,402 over 3y, 23% of budgetKUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN — $534,403 over 3y, 29% of budgetSINAPIS GROUP INC — $511,905 over 3y, 17% of budgetGlobal Trust Partners — $488,102 over 2y, 41% of budgetCHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $470,163 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $400,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $245,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC — $181,403 over 3y, 25% of budgetLIFE IN ABUNDANCE INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetHOPE WALKS INC — $116,571 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetChildren of Character Inc — $75,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetCONGO INITIATIVE USA INC — $70,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetUGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY PARTNERS — $55,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetLIFEWATER INC — $53,975 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORGOTTEN VOICES INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetEVERY GENERATION MINISTRIES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetREACT SERVICES — $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetCHRISTS HOPE U S A INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Fruit IncCA34.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Fruit Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Henry P & Susan C Crowell Trust · Tyndale House Ministries · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Servant Foundation · Stewardship Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Micah 68 Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Westwood Endowment Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Westwood Endowment Inc?

Find your warmest path to Westwood Endowment Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph