· Public charity
Westside Future Fund Inc
To advance a compassionate approach to neighborhood revitalization that creates a diverse, mixed-income community, improves the quality of life for current and future residents and elevates the historic westside's unique history and culture.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $264,812 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $930,611 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $665,799 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPERATION HOPE INC | $100,000 |
| MOREHOUSE COLLEGE INC | $50,000 |
| SPELMAN COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| TUSKEGEE AIRMEN ACADEMY | $33,300 |
| OAKSATL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC | $31,512 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- QCQUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC2× · 2019–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +254%
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC3× · 2018–2020 · $1.1M · revenue +103%- AVATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN4× · 2019–2022 · $712k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- BTBOOKER T WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $150k
- ACAUC CONSORTIUM INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +357%
- ASAPF SUPPORT INCgraduated2× · 2021–2022 · $126k · revenue +213%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
To serve atlanta, georgia, by providing quality economic and community development resources to underserved residents in a culturally competent, fiscally responsible, and ethical manner.
Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.
Non profit to advance homeownership in the asian american community
The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…
It is the mission of leadership atlanta to build a better community for everyone in the atlanta region through education about the key issues facing the region and inspiring members and others to take on and exercise real leadership…
Driven by our belief that High-Impact Entrepreneurs transform economies, Endeavor is on a mission to build thriving entrepreneurial ecosystems in emerging and underserved markets around the world.
The Historic Oakland Foundation partners with the City of Atlanta to preserve, restore, enhance, and share Oakland Cemetery with the public as an important island of tranquilty in the heart of the city.
We work with renters and homeowners to self-organize and defend their right to remain. We fight to preserve affordable housing for just living conditions to prevent gentrification and to build community power for an Atlanta-wide housing…
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
Serves the interest of multifamily housing owners, managers, developers and suppliers and promotes a high level of professionalism in the multifamily industry to better serve the rental needs of the public.
To empower financially vulnerable individuals in our community to become self-sufficient, sustainably employed, and economic contributors to society.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sisters Action Team Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 32% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRITY TRANSFORMATIONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds RAISING EXPECTATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds AUC CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds APF SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds OAKSATL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SISTERS ACTION TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds Truly Living Well Ctr for Natural Urban ↗
- Who funds Open Doors Solutions Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANTIOCH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds METRO ATLANTA HOST COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Peace Preparatory Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds ON THE RISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Boy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council ↗
- Who funds INSPIREDU INC ↗
- Who funds Historic Westside Gardens Atlanta Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Fraser-Parker Foundation · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgiainc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Westside Future Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.