Skip to content

· Private foundation

Western Virginia Environmental and Social Trust Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$28kFood & Nutrition$16kEnvironment$15kHousing & Shelter$8kHuman Services$8kReligion$8kCrime & Legal$1kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$407k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASTERPIECE ALLIANCE$10,000
BLUE RIDGE LAND CONSERVANCY$2,500
BRADLEY FREE CLINIC$2,000
RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES$2,000
SALEMROANOKE FOOD PANTRY$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
ROANOKE AREA MINISTRIES$2,000
CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP$2,000
APPLE RIDGE FARM$1,000
PRESERVE CRAIG INC$1,000
JOHNS CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$500
CRAIG COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 12 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$101k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+554%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MASTERPIECE ALLIANCE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +379%
  • BF
    BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +63%
  • RA
    Roanoke Area Ministries
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • PF
    PATHFINDERS FOR GREENWAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +554%
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +6%
  • JC
    Johns Creek Volunteer Fire
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roanoke Outside

To make outdoor recreation and environmental stewardship a core component of the roanoke region lifestyle through activities such as educating citizens about benefits of outdoor recreational activities, educating citizens about…

Recreation & Sports
2
Roanoke Valley Rescue Squad Inc

Provide emergency medical services, emergency medical trasportation, and search and rescue of missing persons.

Health
3
Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau

Regional Visitors Bureau, Destination Marketing Organization

—
4
Roane County Family Health Care Inc

The mission of roane family health care is to exceed the quality of care that our patients deserve and expect while surpassing community needs through innovative technology.

Health
5
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
6
The Rescue Mission Foundation

The rescue mission foundation, inc. is an endowment fund organized for the support of the charitable purposes of the rescue mission of roanoke, inc., a related 501 (c)(3) organization, which seeks to minister to the whole person and…

—
7
Roanoke Regional Partnership

To promote economic development of the roanoke region in virginia.

—
8
Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber is a Business Advocate for the Roanoke Region.

—
9
Roanoke Emergency Medical Services

To provide pre-hospital care and transport to the sick and injured.

Health
10
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
11
West Virginia Rural Health Association Inc

The west virginia rural health association (wvrha) advocates for empowering all west virginians to advance their quality of life, their well-being, and their access to excellence in rural health care. our mission is to unite people,…

Health
12
Roanoke River Museum

preservation of historical property

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Southwest Virginia; the most unlike its peers is Apple Ridge Farm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $10,000 · OtherBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INCCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $10,000 · OtherCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEYRoanoke Area Ministries: $10,000 · OtherRoanoke Area MinistriesSalvation Army: $10,000 · OtherSalvation ArmySalem Food Pantry: $8,000 · OtherSalem Food PantryRoanoke Rescue Mission: $8,000 · OtherRoanoke Rescue MissionAPPLE RIDGE FARM INC: $5,000 · OtherAPPLE RIDGE FARM INC+5 more: $6,000 · Other+5 moreMASTERPIECE ALLIANCE: $21,600 · HealthMASTERPIECE ALLIANCELAND SAVERS UNITED: $11,000 · EnvironmentLAND SAVERS UNIT…PATHFINDERS FOR GREENWAY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentPATHFINDERS FOR …FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $4,000 · Food & NutritionTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$67,000Health$21,600Environment$16,000Food & Nutrition$4,000Human Services$2,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMASTERPIECE ALLIANCE: $21,600 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetLAND SAVERS UNITED: $11,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRoanoke Area Ministries: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAPPLE RIDGE FARM INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPATHFINDERS FOR GREENWAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCraig County Historical Society: $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MASTERPIECE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LAND SAVERS UNITED ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Roanoke Area Ministries ↗
  • Who funds APPLE RIDGE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS FOR GREENWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Craig County Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Serving Western VirginiaVA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Muse Family Foundation Co Elizabeth Muse · Powell Charitable Foundation · Edgar a Thurman Fdn Children Nect · The Beirne Carter Foundation · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Evelyn F James Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Western Virginia Environmental and Social Trust Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Western Virginia Environmental and Social Trust Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Western Virginia Environmental and Social’s filings →

    More from the funding graph