Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Westchester Academic Library Directors' Organization

To provide members with an online system for library management and a vehicle for students and librarians of member organizations to access internet resources at discount rates

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $125,711 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $128,711 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY LIBRARY$17,711
ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY$12,000
MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY$12,000
MANHATTAN UNIVERSITY$12,000
PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$12,000
ST THOMAS AQUINAS$12,000
IONA UNIVERSITY$12,000
SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE LIBRARY$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT ST VINCENT$12,000
MERCY UNIVERSITY$12,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MERCY UNIVERSITY: $12k → 9%ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY: $12k → 13%ST THOMAS AQUINAS: $12k → 14%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: $18k → 28%IONA UNIVERSITY: $12k → 9%MANHATTAN UNIVERSITY: $12k → 28%SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE LIBRARY: $12k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT ST VINCENT: $12k → 28%MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 9%PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
4
Molloy University

Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

Education
5
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

6
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
7
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
8
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
11
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
12
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manhattanville University and the most unlike its peers is Iona University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
0/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fordham University — $17,711 · EducationFordham UniversityUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT — $12,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENTMERCY UNIVERSITY — $12,000 · EducationMERCY UNIVERSITYSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $12,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGEST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK — $12,000 · EducationST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORKMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY — $12,000 · EducationMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITYManhattan University — $12,000 · EducationManhattan UniversityST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $12,000 · EducationST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGEIONA UNIVERSITY — $12,000 · EducationIONA UNIVERSITYPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · EducationPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
Education$125,711

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFordham University — $17,711 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY UNIVERSITY — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan University — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Westchester Academic Library Directors' Organization funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Westchester Academic Library Directors' Organization?

    Find your warmest path to Westchester Academic Library Directors' Organization through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph