Skip to content

· Private foundation

Westbrook Foundation Inc

To Administer Funds Whose Income Is to Be Used For The Benefit Of Residents Of The Town Of Westbrook.

$519k
Granted FY2024still arriving
86
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$74k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.2MHuman Services$386kPublic Benefit$347kFood & Nutrition$181kReligion$169kHousing & Shelter$155kHealth$106kEmployment$84kOther$0
02FY2024 · 86 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k77 grants · $277k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $137k
$3,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$73,940
First Congregational Church of West$63,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE WESTBROOK LIBRARY$18,512
SAFE HARBOR$13,992
ST PAUL'S CHURCH WESTBROOK$13,015
WESTBROOK YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$13,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
ESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,500
Individual grant recipient$8,500
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
WESTBROOK GARDEN CLUB$6,884
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 118 repeat orgs$727k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

118 repeat relationships: 51 still active in FY2024, 67 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

118
149

Total granted

$2.3M
$571k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-4%

Still filing today

7%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    Valley Shore YMCA Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $216k · revenue +48%
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +15%
  • CH
    CAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • TO
    TOWN OF WESTBROOK
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • WB
    WESTBROOK BD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $43k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seabird Enterprises Inc

Day program services for state of ct department of developmental services clients. they are provided with support and training for placement within the community as self sufficient individuals.

Human Services
2
Hart United Inc

To provide support services to individuals with developmental disabilities throughout connecticut and to maintain a commitment to empower individuals with developmental disabilities and their families to have more choices and opportunities…

Unclassified
3
Viability Inc

Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.

Employment
4
Lymes Youth Service Bureau

The purpose of the Organization is to provide programs and services for the youth and families of Lyme and Old Lyme, CT. The Organization identifies and satisfies various youth needs by providing professional guidance to promote healthy…

—
5
Central Connecticut Coast Young Men's Christian Association Inc

To put judeo-christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
6
Young Mens Christian Assoc of Greenwich Inc

The ymca of greenwich's mission is: to bring together and strengthen the community through programs and services that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all men, women and children.

Human Services
7
Ymca of the North Shore Inc

Our YMCA welcomes all. We strengthen communities, educate and nurture children, and promote healthy living in spirit, mind and body. Our strategic goals include providing youth and teen skill development, reversing the obesity epidemic,…

Human Services
8
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
9
Abilities Inc

Abilites Inc is a non-profit agency dedicated to facilitating integrated employment and full participation of persons with disabilities in their work and living communities. Employment is accomplished through direct service to youth and…

—
10
Somerset County Young Men's Christian Association Inc

Greater Somerset County YMCA is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) public charity dedicated to strengthening community by helping all individuals discover their potential, purpose, and connection to others. (Continued on Schedule O)

Human Services
11
Young Men's Christian Association of Rye New York

Founded in 1914, the Young Men's Christian Association of Rye, NY (Rye YMCA or Rye Y), serves the communities of Rye, Larchmont, Mamaroneck, Harrison and Port Chester. With a focus on youth development, healthy living and social…

—
12
The Caring Community of Connecticut Inc

To provide a full range of community based services for developmentally disabled persons, most especially those who have behavioral and social deficits which are not easily accommodated by the general community. it is the agency's goal to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc; the most unlike its peers is Maritime Education Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 302 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $343,892 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFirst Congregational Church of West: $170,760 · OtherFirst Congregational Church of WestIndividual grant recipient: $165,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFE HARBOR INC: $85,215 · Other+188 more: $1,713,118 · Other+188 moreValley Shore YMCA Inc: $215,500 · Human ServicesValley Shore Y…CAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $43,500 · Human ServicesCAMP HAZEN YOU…BARE NECESSITIES INC: $33,300 · Human ServicesBARE NECESSITI…WESTBROOK YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesWESTBROOK YOUT…ESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesESTUARY COUNCI…+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesLUMIBILITY INC: $15,500 · EmploymentMaritime Education Network Inc: $3,500 · Education
Other$2,477,985Human Services$353,300Employment$15,500Education$3,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetValley Shore YMCA Inc: $215,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $85,215 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetCAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $43,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBARE NECESSITIES INC: $33,300 over 5y, 14% of budgetWESTBROOK YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $33,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLUMIBILITY INC: $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMaritime Education Network Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetA LITTLE COMPASSION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Valley Shore YMCA Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARE NECESSITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTBROOK YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds ESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUMIBILITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rockfall FoundationCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rockfall Foundation · Community Foundation of Middlesex County Inc · Kitchings Family Foundation · Chelsea Groton Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Westbrook Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westbrook Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Lumibility Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Westbrook Youth and Family Services Inc: 7% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Westbrook Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Westbrook Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 302 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Westbrook’s filings →

More from the funding graph