Skip to content

· Public charity

West Tennessee Legal Services INC

Legal services to poor and underprivileged.

$384k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$6.1MHousing & Shelter$1.9M
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $259k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$27,635
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Appalachian Research & Defense Fund of Ky Inc$70,309
Legal Aid of the Bluegrass$54,448
Atlanta Legal Aid Society Inc$37,322
Montana Legal Services Association$34,665
Legal Services of Northern Michigan$34,078
Legal Aid of East Tennessee$27,635
Community Legal Services of Mid-Florida$27,171
North Mississippi Rural Legal Services$27,086
Legal Services Corporation of AL$22,414
Kentucky Legal Aid Inc$18,638
Legal Aid Society of Middle Tennessee & The Cumberlands$15,947
University Legal Services$13,868
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONTANA LEGAL SERVICES: $55k → 9%JACKSONVILLE AREA LEGAL AID: $55k → 14%LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $64k → 13%LEGAL SERVICES OF ALABAMA: $53k → 18%LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI: $47k → 15%LEGAL AID OF EAST TENNESSEE: $311k → 12%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TN: $368k → 13%TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $337k → 15%Memphis Area Legal Services: $201k → 17%TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $209k → 17%ATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $81k → 13%ATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $60k → 14%LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS: $106k → 11%LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS: $132k → 21%APPALACHIA RESEARCH & DEFENSE FUND: $76k → 35%MONTANA LEGAL SERVICES: $45k → 9%LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $59k → 13%Legal Aid of East Tennessee: $154k → 12%Legal Aid Society of Middle Tennessee & The Cumberlands: $361k → 13%TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $311k → 15%MEMPHIS AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC: $123k → 17%TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $204k → 17%ATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $59k → 14%LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS: $92k → 11%LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS: $101k → 21%Appalachian Research & Defense Fund of Ky Inc: $75k → 35%MONTANA LEGAL SERVICES: $43k → 9%LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $53k → 13%LEGAL AID OF EAST TENNESSEE: $98k → 12%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TN: $105k → 13%TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $309k → 15%TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $203k → 17%ATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $51k → 14%LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS: $49k → 11%KENTUCKY LEGAL AID: $41k → 18%LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS: $79k → 21%Appalachian Research & Defense Fund of Ky Inc: $70k → 35%Legal Services of Northern Michigan: $48k → 13%LEGAL AID OF EAST TENNESSEE: $41k → 12%TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $269k → 15%LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS: $67k → 21%APPALACHIA RESEARCH & DEFENSE FUND: $67k → 35%LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $47k → 13%LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI: $48k → 15%Legal Aid of the Bluegrass: $57k → 21%APPALACHIA RESEARCH & DEFENSE FUND: $46k → 35%LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $43k → 13%Legal Aid of the Bluegrass: $54k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
PA
NE
MO
KY
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 21 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$8.0M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+76%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +294% · 30% of their budget
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE AND THE CUMBERLANDS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +122%
  • NK
    Northern Kentucky Legal Aid Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $738k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
2
Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc

The mission of Virginia Legal Aid Society is to resolve serious legal problems of low-income people, promote economic and family stability, reduce poverty through effective legal assistance, and to champion equal justice.

Crime & Legal
3
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
4
Legal Aid of Arkansas

To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.

Crime & Legal
5
The Toledo Legal Aid Society

Toledo Legal Aid Society provides legal representation for indigent clients that are charged with criminal, traffic, or juvenile offenses for which the penalty or any possible adjudication includes the potential loss of liberty.

—
6
Legal Aid Society of Eastern Virginia

Legal aid society of eastern virginia provides legal assistance in non-criminal proceedings to persons financially unable to afford such assistance.

Crime & Legal
7
South Carolina Legal Services

South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.

Crime & Legal
8
Legal Aid Services of Oregon

The primary purpose of legal aid services of oregon shall be to achieve justice for the low-income communities of oregon by providing a full range of the highest quality civil legal services.

Crime & Legal
9
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal
10
West Tennessee Legal Services Inc

Legal services to poor and underprivileged.

—
11
Legal Services of Long Island

To provide free legal assistance in non-criminal matters to persons meeting financial eligibility requirements or having other special needs.

—
12
Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati

To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legal Services Alabama Inc; the most unlike its peers is Housing Options Provided for the Elderly Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northern Kentucky Legal Aid Society: $738,189 · Crime & LegalNorthern Kentucky Legal Aid SocietyMemphis Area Legal Services Inc: $458,321 · Crime & LegalMemphis Area Legal Services IncAppalachian Research and Defense Fund of Kentucky Inc: $443,477 · Crime & LegalAppalachian Research and Defense Fund of Kentucky IncLegal Services of Northern Michigan: $415,170 · Crime & LegalLegal Services of Northern MichiganATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC: $413,490 · Crime & LegalATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY INCLEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC: $291,626 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INCCUMBERLAND TRACE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $247,592 · Crime & LegalCUMBERLAND TRACE LEGAL SERVICES INCNorth MS Rural Legal Services Inc: $201,331 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $173,197 · Crime & LegalLegal Aid of Western Missouri: $173,136 · Crime & Legal+5 more: $238,660 · Crime & Legal+5 moreLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE AND THE CUMBERLANDS: $1,034,086 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TENNE…LEGAL AID OF EAST TENNESSEE: $712,130 · OtherLEGAL AID OF EAST TENNESSEEMONTANA LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $334,914 · OtherMONTANA LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATIO…COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES OF MID-FLORIDA INC: $141,311 · OtherCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES OF MID-F…JACKSONVILLE AREA LEGAL AID INC: $93,240 · Other+1 more: $30,601 · OtherTENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $1,840,749 · Housing & ShelterTENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIO…
Crime & Legal$3,794,189Other$2,346,282Housing & Shelter$1,840,749

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS: $1,840,749 over 7y, 30% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE AND THE CUMBERLANDS: $1,034,086 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetNorthern Kentucky Legal Aid Society: $738,189 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetLEGAL AID OF EAST TENNESSEE: $712,130 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetMemphis Area Legal Services Inc: $458,321 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetAppalachian Research and Defense Fund of Kentucky Inc: $443,477 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetLegal Services of Northern Michigan: $415,170 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC: $413,490 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMONTANA LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $334,914 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC: $291,626 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCUMBERLAND TRACE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $247,592 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNorth MS Rural Legal Services Inc: $201,331 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $173,197 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetLegal Aid of Western Missouri: $173,136 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES OF MID-FLORIDA INC: $141,311 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCharlotte Center for Legal Advocacy Inc: $124,339 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetJACKSONVILLE AREA LEGAL AID INC: $93,240 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA: $37,565 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $32,499 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATED: $30,601 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSUMMIT LEGAL AID: $22,478 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP: $21,779 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TENNESSEE HOMELESS SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE AND THE CUMBERLANDS ↗
  • Who funds Northern Kentucky Legal Aid Society ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF EAST TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Area Legal Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Research and Defense Fund of Kentucky Inc ↗
  • Who funds Legal Services of Northern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND TRACE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds North MS Rural Legal Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Legal Aid of Western Missouri ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES OF MID-FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE AREA LEGAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Legal Services CorporationDC41× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legal Services Corporation · Equal Justice Works · American College of Bankruptcy Foundation · National Legal Aid and Defender Association · National Health Law Program Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization West Tennessee Legal Services INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from West Tennessee Legal Services INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Jacksonville Area Legal Aid Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Community Legal Services of Mid-Florida Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on West Tennessee Legal Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph