· Public charity
American College of Bankruptcy Foundation
To promote the educational and charitable activities of the american college of bankruptcy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k50 grants · $686k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JUST THE BEGINNING | $38,341 |
| VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES | $27,500 |
| CITY BAR JUSTICE CENTER | $22,500 |
| NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BANKRUPTCY BAR ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ASSISTANCE | $15,000 |
| EMERGENCY LEGAL RESPONDERS | $15,000 |
| CENTS | $15,000 |
| LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION OF DELAWARE | $15,000 |
| NASHVILLE CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER | $15,000 |
| SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS | $15,000 |
| THE PRO BONO PROJECT | $15,000 |
| BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC | $15,000 |
| LEGAL ACCESS ALAMEDA | $15,000 |
| CARE LOS ANGELES | $15,000 |
| LEGAL AID ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.
74 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VLVOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROJECT OF THE BOSTON BAR ASSOCIATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $93k · revenue +36%
- TPTHE PRO BONO PROJECT8× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +64%
- LALegal Aid Society of Cincinnati8× · 2017–2024 · $83k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- CLCOMMUNITY LEGAL ACCESSone grant, 2023 · $20k
- PBPRO BONO INDIANA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +70%
- SLST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
The mission of Virginia Legal Aid Society is to resolve serious legal problems of low-income people, promote economic and family stability, reduce poverty through effective legal assistance, and to champion equal justice.
To help low-income clients access the civil justice system by providing volunteer attorneys who donate free legal advice and representation, and by supporting and training those attorneys.
To provide free legal assistance in non-criminal matters to persons meeting financial eligibility requirements or having other special needs.
As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.
To provide civil legal services to low-income individuals and to promote equal access to the justice system through advocacy, legal counseling, innovative self-help services, in depth legal representation, community education, and economic…
Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…
Legal aid of east tennessee provides legal representation, legal education, and other civil legal services for the low-income population in our community through advocacy of all types.
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.
To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…
Our mission is to provide civil legal service to low-income clients. our legal services provide basic protection for our clients by enforcing the law when their rights have been violated, promote the self-sufficiency of individuals…
Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Legal Services of Mid-Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pro Se Bankruptcy Assistance Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROJECT OF THE BOSTON BAR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PRO BONO PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER LAWYERS NETWORK LTD ↗
- Who funds DC BAR PRO BONO CENTER ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
- Who funds VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE IN ↗
- Who funds SHORE LEGAL ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC SERVICE LAW CORPORATION DBA RIVERSIDE LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds CONEJO FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES VERMONT INC ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW ↗
- Who funds Consumer Education and Training Services ↗
- Who funds South Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program ↗
- Who funds ACCESS JUSTICE BROOKLYN INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Legal Services of Eastern Michigan ↗
- Who funds CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ASSISTANCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Association of California ↗
- Who funds JUST THE BEGINNING - A PIPELINE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Legal Access Alameda ↗
- Who funds NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES NYC ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE CONFLICT RESOLUTION CTR ↗
- Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Alameda County Bar Association ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT 10 PRO BONO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY LEGAL RESPONDERS ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION A ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY RIGHTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Legal Services Corporation · Equal Justice Works · The Skadden Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation · AARP Foundation · National Legal Aid and Defender Association · The New York Bar Foundation · The Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Foundation · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · Littler Mendelson Foundation Inc Attn Tax Manager · West Tennessee Legal Services INC · Mc Dermott Will and Emery Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American College of Bankruptcy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Legal Aid Inc — 72% of income from government
- Veterans Legal Services Inc — 16% of income from government
- Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc — 13% of income from government
- Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Legal Aid Services of Oregon — 10% of income from government
- Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County Inc — 10% of income from government
- Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in — 9% of income from government
- Shore Legal Access Inc — 9% of income from government
- Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service Inc — 7% of income from government
- Community Legal Aid Inc — 5% of income from government
- Maryland Legal Services Corporation — 4% of income from government
- Greater Boston Legal Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Community Legal Services of Mid-Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Northeast New Jersey Legal Services Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc — 2% of income from government
- Legal Services Corp of Delaware — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.