· Private foundation
Werth-Silver Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k44 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Human Rights Annual Pledge | $20,000 |
| AARP Foundation | $18,350 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,389 |
| Friends of WLRN | $2,500 |
| Central Synagogue NYC | $2,000 |
| Intl Womens Forum | $1,520 |
| Columbia Law (IHO Harriet Rabb) | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| World Jewish Congress | $1,000 |
| THE WOLFSONIAN-FIU | $1,000 |
| Refugee Assistance Alliance | $626 |
| Anti Defamation League | $620 |
| FL Bar Foundation (endowment) | $519 |
| Individual grant recipient | $515 |
| HASTINGS CENTER | $515 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC2× · 2018–2020 · $6k · revenue +10%
- NMNAMI MIAMI DADE COUNTY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +301%
- CHChildren's Hospital Corporation5× · 2018–2022 · $5k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- HSHarriest S Rabb Fund at the Hastings Centerone grant, 2023 · $3k
- TITEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREATER MIAMIone grant, 2022 · $1k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Americas society is an educational forum which presents programs in its public policy and cultural affairs departments.
The miami association of realtors (miami) was chartered by the national association of realtors in 1920 and is celebrating 105 years of service to realtors, the buying and selling public, and the communities in south florida. comprised of…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Miami Dade County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI MIAMI DADE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds THE MISSION CONTINUES ↗
- Who funds CAMILLUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds SUITED FOR SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · Coral Gables Community Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · The Kirk Foundation · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Werth-Silver Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Refugee Assistance Alliance Inc — 92% of income from government
- Friends of the Underline Inc — 66% of income from government
- On the Rise Inc — 39% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Camillus House Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Bakehouse Art Complex Inc — 2% of income from government
- Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc — 2% of income from government
- Young Musicians Unite Inc — 0% of income from government
- Suited for Success Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.