Skip to content

· Private foundation

Werth-Silver Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$99kCivil Rights$52kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$13kInternational$11kEducation$8kCrime & Legal$7kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k44 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$250
Median grant
14
States reached
$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Human Rights Annual Pledge$20,000
AARP Foundation$18,350
Individual grant recipient$7,389
Friends of WLRN$2,500
Central Synagogue NYC$2,000
Intl Womens Forum$1,520
THE WOLFSONIAN-FIU$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
World Jewish Congress$1,000
Columbia Law (IHO Harriet Rabb)$1,000
Refugee Assistance Alliance$626
Anti Defamation League$620
FL Bar Foundation (endowment)$519
HASTINGS CENTER$515
Individual grant recipient$515
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%On The Rise Inc: $200 → 8%American Red Cross: $125 → 14%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $100 → 15%Friends of the Underline: $500 → 15%FRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE: $200 → 15%FRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE: $200 → 15%Refugee Assistance Alliance: $626 → 15%Refugee Assistance Alliance: $600 → 15%Refugee Assistance Alliance: $521 → 15%Refugee Assistance Alliance: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 61 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
56

Total granted

$198k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+16%

Still filing today

44%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NAMI MIAMI DADE COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +301%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    5× · 2018–2022 · $5k · revenue +78%
  • SF
    SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • HS
    Harriest S Rabb Fund at the Hastings Center
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • GM
    Greater Miami Jewish Federation - Israel Emerg Fun
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREATER MIAMI
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
University of Miami
—
6
Americas Society Inc

Americas society is an educational forum which presents programs in its public policy and cultural affairs departments.

International
7
Miami Association of Realtors Inc

The miami association of realtors (miami) was chartered by the national association of realtors in 1920 and is celebrating 105 years of service to realtors, the buying and selling public, and the communities in south florida. comprised of…

—
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Miami Dade County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
35/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AARP Foundation: $74,600 · OtherAARP FoundationHuman Rights Annual Pledge: $42,500 · OtherHuman Rights Annual PledgeIndividual grant recipient: $7,389 · Other+114 more: $74,511 · Other+114 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation: $5,000 · HealthSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $3,700 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $3,250 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · Health+6 more: $1,550 · HealthGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $10,300 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $6,200 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $850 · International+1 more: $100 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC: $2,520 · EducationMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $921 · EducationBASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $300 · Education+2 more: $200 · EducationREFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE INC: $1,847 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE INC: $900 · Human ServicesON THE RISE INC: $200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $125 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesTHE MISSION CONTINUES: $1,250 · EmploymentSUITED FOR SUCCESS INC: $1,008 · EmploymentHealing to Action: $750 · Employment
Other$199,000Health$14,000Philanthropy$10,400International$7,150Education$3,941Human Services$3,172Employment$3,008

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $10,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $6,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI MIAMI DADE COUNTY INC: $5,041 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $3,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC: $2,520 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE INC: $1,847 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMILLUS HOUSE INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MISSION CONTINUES: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,120 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUITED FOR SUCCESS INC: $1,008 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $921 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHealing to Action: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MUSICIANS UNITE INC: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $480 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMiami Rescue Mission Inc: $409 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLegal Services of Greater Miami Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetON THE RISE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAKEHOUSE ART COMPLEX INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF YADDO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS FOR KIDS CO PETER DWARES: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MIAMI DADE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds CAMILLUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSION CONTINUES ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SUITED FOR SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · Coral Gables Community Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · The Kirk Foundation · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Werth-Silver Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Werth-Silver Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Refugee Assistance Alliance Inc: 92% of income from government
  • Friends of the Underline Inc: 66% of income from government
  • On the Rise Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Camillus House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Bakehouse Art Complex Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Young Musicians Unite Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Suited for Success Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Werth-Silver’s filings →

More from the funding graph