· Private foundation
Wenwach Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WAS | $10,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIORS | $7,000 |
| AMERICAN UNIVERSITY | $7,000 |
| IT TAKES A VILLAGE MINISTRY INC | $6,000 |
| COMPASSION AND CHOICES | $5,000 |
| DC ABORTION FUND | $5,000 |
| SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC | $5,000 |
| DEATH WITH DIGNITY NATIONAL CENTER | $5,000 |
| SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC | $4,000 |
| J Ashe | $4,000 |
| NEADS INC | $4,000 |
| WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC | $4,000 |
| CENTER FOR A NEW CULTURE | $4,000 |
| DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUS | $3,000 |
| MARYS CENTER FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD CARE INC | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
26 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +41%
- CCCOMPASSION & CHOICES9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +169%
- DWDEATH WITH DIGNITY NATIONAL CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- SCSINGLE CAUSE SINGLE CUREone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -54%
- RSROSS SCHOOL PTAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +96%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.
Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…
The mission is to enable all marylanders to have access to a wide range of high quality, affordable reproductive health care services. by providing medical services, education, training and advocacy, ppm seeks to help individuals make…
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
National institute for reproductive health, inc. works to protect and advance equitable access to reproductive health care by building power at the state and local level. using an approach that is rooted in partnerships with state and…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
The mission of Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation is to advance scientific knowledge in the fields of reproductive biology and women's health; translate this knowledge into improved health for women and infants; train current…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
How this is measured
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
- Who funds DEATH WITH DIGNITY NATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds DC ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR A NEW CULTURE ↗
- Who funds DUPONT CIRCLE VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds NEADS INC ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Street Sense Inc ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust ↗
- Who funds SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds MSI US ↗
- Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SINGLE CAUSE SINGLE CURE ↗
- Who funds ROSS SCHOOL PTA ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Wenwach Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wenwach Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
- Neads Inc: 1% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Wenwach’s filings →