Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wenaas Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.2MHealth$257kPhilanthropy$55kFood & Nutrition$52kHuman Services$50kAnimals$34kEnvironment$34kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEEN CHALLENGE$50,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
ST JUDES$10,000
ANGEL CHARITY$10,000
CURE AZHEIMERS FUND$10,000
WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION$5,000
WELD FOOD BANK$5,000
WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$5,000
ALS UNITED ROCKY MOUNTAIN$1,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,036
A WOMENS PLACE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SENIOR RESOURCE SERVICES: $3k → 12%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 15%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 15%Ronald McDonald House: $5k → 15%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $1k → 15%60 RIDE: $3k → 9%60 RIDE: $3k → 9%Senior Resource Services: $2k → 9%Senior Resource Services: $2k → 9%60 RIDE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CO
NE
AZ
TN
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 22 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
32

Total granted

$1.6M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+54%

Still filing today

82%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +12% · 34% of their budget
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +125%
  • WF
    WELD FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • NC
    NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER FOUND
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Colorado West Inc

We rebuild lives and inspire hope by providing exceptional mental health and addiction recovery care strengthening the health and vitality of our communities.

Health
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
7
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
8
Colorado State Fire Chiefs

The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
10
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Weld Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Amerind Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
37/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC: $1,190,000 · OtherTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INCTEEN CHALLENGE: $50,000 · Other+37 more: $175,879 · Other+37 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $42,500 · HealthAMERICAN CA…WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION: $16,725 · HealthWELD LEGACY…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,453 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…+6 more: $19,049 · Health+6 moreWELD FOOD BANK: $52,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyWELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $16,036 · Human ServicesSENIOR RESOURCE SERVICES: $12,500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $3,541 · Human ServicesVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCOLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST: $33,602 · EnvironmentTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $29,554 · Animals
Other$1,415,879Health$183,727Food & Nutrition$52,000Philanthropy$43,500Human Services$38,577Environment$33,602Animals$29,554

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC: $1,190,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $52,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $42,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST: $33,602 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $29,554 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWELD LEGACY FOUNDATION: $16,725 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $16,036 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCE SERVICES: $12,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,453 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE LIVES THE LYDIA DODY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $5,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetThe Amerind Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF WELD COUNTY: $4,539 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $3,590 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $3,541 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc: $3,300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREELEY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE DBA GREELEY FAMILY HOUSE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRACHEL'S GIFT INC: $1,049 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAngel Eyes: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWalk with Me: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRANK GALE FAITH NOT FEAR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR RESOURCE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE LIVES THE LYDIA DODY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Amerind Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF WELD COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds The Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO37.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Weld Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Tointon Family Foundation · The Weld Trust · United Way of Weld County Inc · Weld Legacy Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Anschutz Family Foundation · Sorelle Family Foundation · Monfort Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wenaas Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wenaas Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wenaas Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph