Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weld Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$195kHealth$127kYouth Development$70kEducation$63kEnvironment$50kHuman Services$11kRecreation & Sports$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEAR UP ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$15,000
EGYPTIAN THEATER$5,000
J OWEN TODD CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$5,000
UTAH OPEN LANDS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$446k · 12 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$446k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+22%

Still filing today

58%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROJECT ADVENTURE INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +117%
  • UO
    UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +241%
  • ME
    MANCHESTER ESSEX EDUCATION FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +196%

Funded once

  • BC
    BACH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • PC
    PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MANCHESTER ESSEX PERFORM
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
4
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
5
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
6
National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter Inc

The organization promotes high professional standards and provides governance education to boards of directors and senior corporate management.

Philanthropy
7
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
8
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
9
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
10
Massachusetts Assisted Living Association Inc

To lead the assisted living industry in its service of seniors through advocacy, education, operational support, and enhanced growth opportunities.

—
11
Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc

The mission of Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries (Goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. Not charity, but a chance.

Employment
12
Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership Inc D/B/a Metro Housing Boston

Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parents Helping Parents - the Roundtable of Support Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dismas of Vermont Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT ADVENTURE INC: $70,000 · OtherPROJECT ADVENTURE INCMASS GENERAL - FAVA CHAIR: $50,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL - FAVA CHAIRBACH CENTER: $50,000 · OtherBACH CENTERMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $50,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALMANCHESTER ESSEX EDUCATION FUND INC: $35,000 · OtherMANCHESTER ESSEX EDUCATION FUND INCPRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $15,000 · Other+9 more: $35,500 · Other+9 moreTHE WANG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WANG CENTER FOR THE PER…UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentUTAH OPEN …GEAR UP ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · EducationMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsDismas of Vermont Inc: $1,000 · Crime & LegalCABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID: $1,000 · Crime & LegalPARENTS HELPING PARENTS - THE ROUNDTABLE OF SUPPORT INC: $500 · Crime & LegalSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$305,500Arts & Culture$125,000Environment$50,000Education$25,000Health$10,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Crime & Legal$2,500Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WANG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $125,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT ADVENTURE INC: $70,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMANCHESTER ESSEX EDUCATION FUND INC: $35,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetGEAR UP ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCare Dimensions Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDismas of Vermont Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS - THE ROUNDTABLE OF SUPPORT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WANG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ADVENTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER ESSEX EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GEAR UP ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Care Dimensions Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dismas of Vermont Inc ↗
  • Who funds CABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS HELPING PARENTS - THE ROUNDTABLE OF SUPPORT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weld Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weld Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Dismas of Vermont Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc: 14% of income from government
  • The Wang Center for the Performing Arts Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Project Adventure Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weld Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Weld Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weld Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph