Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weitzman Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$870k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$190kFood & Nutrition$125kHealth$65kReligion$45kHousing & Shelter$35kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $97k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.7M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEITZMAN DONOR ADVISED FUND$869,588
SW VW DONOR ADVISED FUND$869,588
SISTERS GRADUATE RESOURCE ORGANIZAT$32,051
ST EDWARD THE MARTYR CATHOLIC CHURC$25,000
PARTNERS IN CARE$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$10,000
SISTERS KIWANIS FOOD BANK$10,000
FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK - SISTERS$10,000
SPARROW CLUBS USA$5,000
DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF REDMOND: $5k → 10%HOSPICE OF REDMOND: $5k → 10%HOSPICE OF REDMOND: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $10k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $10k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $10k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$520k · 14 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$520k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-40%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesReligionFood & NutritionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    10× · 2017–2026 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • PD
    Paz De Cristo Community Center
    7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +54%
  • HF
    Hope for Addiction Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • OF
    OHSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • RH
    RYAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE INTERNATIONAL REL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Spokane

Hospice of spokane provides a holistic approach to end-of-life care, addressing the medical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill person and their loved ones.

Human Services
2
Hospice House Inc

We give care, comfort, and compassion through and beyond end of life.

Human Services
3
Mt Hood Hospice

It is the mission of Mt. Hood Hospice to provide an independent, community-based program of care for terminally ill patients and their loved ones that emphasizes dignity, comfort and choices for quality of life, regardless of the ability…

—
4
Hospice of the Valleys Sc Inc

We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.

Human Services
5
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
6
Our Hospice of South Central Indiana Inc

Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 44 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…

Human Services
7
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
8
Serenity Hospice and Home

Patient care and counseling of the terminally ill and their families.

—
9
Shepherd Home Inc

To provide compassionate comfort care to members of our community with life-limiting illnesses, in a way that cherishes the dignity of each individual and meets their physical, emotional, and spiritual needs.

Human Services
10
Our Hospice House

None

Human Services
11
Hildegard House Incorporated

Providing a home and compassionate care for individuals at the end of life who have no income or loved ones to care for them so that they may die with dignity.

Housing & Shelter
12
Horizon Health Inc

Providing compassionate, dignified, individualized care to those we serve by partnering with families and communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in Care; the most unlike its peers is Sisters Christian Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SW VW DONOR ADVISED FUND: $869,588 · OtherSW VW DONOR ADVISED FUNDWEITZMAN DONOR ADVISED FUND: $869,588 · OtherWEITZMAN DONOR ADVISED FUNDSISTERS KIWANIS FOOD BANK: $100,000 · OtherFAMILY ACCESS NETWORK - SISTERS: $85,000 · Other+10 more: $182,051 · Other+10 moreDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN CARE: $45,000 · Human ServicesHope for Addiction Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF REDMOND: $15,000 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesSPARROW CLUBS USA: $50,000 · ReligionPaz De Cristo Community Center: $35,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $15,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · International
Other$2,106,227Human Services$135,000Religion$50,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Education$15,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARROW CLUBS USA: $50,000 over 10y, 0.9% of budgetDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 10y, 0.8% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPaz De Cristo Community Center: $35,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHope for Addiction Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF REDMOND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDOOR TO GRACE: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetRYAN HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISTERS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPARROW CLUBS USA ↗
  • Who funds DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE ↗
  • Who funds Paz De Cristo Community Center ↗
  • Who funds Hope for Addiction Inc ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF REDMOND ↗
  • Who funds DOOR TO GRACE ↗
  • Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weitzman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weitzman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weitzman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Weitzman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weitzman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph