Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weitzman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$190kFood & Nutrition$125kHealth$65kReligion$45kHousing & Shelter$35kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SISTERS KIWANIS FOOD BANK$10,000
FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK - SISTERS$10,000
HOPE FOR ADDICTION INC$10,000
DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
SPARROW CLUBS USA$5,000
PARTNERS IN CARE$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF REDMOND: $5k → 10%HOSPICE OF REDMOND: $5k → 10%HOSPICE OF REDMOND: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $10k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $10k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$470k · 14 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -40% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$470k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-40%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionFood & NutritionEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +12%
  • PD
    Paz De Cristo Community Center
    7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +54%
  • HF
    Hope for Addiction Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • OF
    OHSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • RH
    RYAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • SC
    SISTERS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Spokane

Hospice of spokane provides a holistic approach to end-of-life care, addressing the medical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill person and their loved ones.

Human Services
2
Mt Hood Hospice

It is the mission of Mt. Hood Hospice to provide an independent, community-based program of care for terminally ill patients and their loved ones that emphasizes dignity, comfort and choices for quality of life, regardless of the ability…

3
Hospice House Inc

We give care, comfort, and compassion through and beyond end of life.

Human Services
4
Hospice of the Valleys Sc Inc

We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.

Human Services
5
Our Hospice of South Central Indiana Inc

Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 44 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…

Human Services
6
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

7
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
8
Serenity Hospice and Home

Patient care and counseling of the terminally ill and their families.

9
Shepherd Home Inc

To provide compassionate comfort care to members of our community with life-limiting illnesses, in a way that cherishes the dignity of each individual and meets their physical, emotional, and spiritual needs.

Human Services
10
Hildegard House Incorporated

Providing a home and compassionate care for individuals at the end of life who have no income or loved ones to care for them so that they may die with dignity.

Housing & Shelter
11
Our Hospice House

None

Human Services
12
Hospeace House Inc

To provide a warm, respectful environment meeting the physical, spiritual, and emotional needs of those facing the end of life as well as their families. To raise awareness of the hospice philosophy of care.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in Care and the most unlike its peers is Sisters Christian Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SISTERS KIWANIS FOOD BANK — $90,000 · OtherSISTERS KIWANIS FOOD BANKFAMILY ACCESS NETWORK - SISTERS — $75,000 · OtherFAMILY ACCESS NETWORK - SISTERSRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES — $30,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $15,000 · OtherSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITYANDRE HOUSE OF ARIZONA INC — $15,000 · OtherANDRE HOUSE OF ARIZONA INCDOOR TO GRACE — $10,000 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $10,000 · OtherDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $45,000 · Human ServicesDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDA…PARTNERS IN CARE — $35,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN CAREHope for Addiction Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesHope for Addiction IncHOSPICE OF REDMOND — $15,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF REDMONDRYAN HOUSE — $5,000 · Human ServicesSPARROW CLUBS USA — $45,000 · ReligionSPARROW CL…Paz De Cristo Community Center — $35,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE — $15,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 · International
Other$280,000Human Services$120,000Religion$45,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Education$15,000International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSPARROW CLUBS USA — $45,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPaz De Cristo Community Center — $35,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHope for Addiction Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF REDMOND — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDOOR TO GRACE — $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetRYAN HOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSISTERS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPARROW CLUBS USA
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE
  • Who funds Paz De Cristo Community Center
  • Who funds Hope for Addiction Inc
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF REDMOND
  • Who funds SISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE
  • Who funds DOOR TO GRACE
  • Who funds RYAN HOUSE
  • Who funds SISTERS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weitzman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weitzman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Weitzman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph