Skip to content
Weissberg Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Weissberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
143
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$460k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$4.3MEducation$3.6MArts & Culture$2.3MCommunity Improvement$1.7MPublic Benefit$1.3MYouth Development$1.2MPhilanthropy$932kCrime & Legal$906kOther$0
02FY2024 · 143 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $597k
  • $50k–250k82 grants · $7.4M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$50,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$223M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELOIT COLLEGE$460,287
VIRGINIA ORGANIZING$350,000
NEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY$350,000
THE COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE$350,000
COMMUNITY CHANGE$200,000
NEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$200,000
INDIGENOUS CONSERVATION COUNCIL$200,000
NEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY$175,000
NATIVE ORGANIZERS ALLIANCE$175,000
NAKASEC$175,000
DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT$175,000
CASA INC$175,000
PROTEUS FUND INC$160,000
VIRGINIA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE$150,000
PROGRESSNOW EDUCATION$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $767k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUR CHILDREN: $5k → 13%BREAD OF LIFE INC: $3k → 16%NEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $200k → 8%RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE INC: $85k → 14%JUST HARVEST VA: $50k → 7%RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE INC: $25k → 14%YOUNG WOMEN UNITED: $25k → 14%JUST HARVEST VA: $15k → 7%RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE INC: $10k → 14%JUST HARVEST VA: $10k → 7%CHANGING LIVES OUTREACH CENTER: $5k → 14%JUST HARVEST VA: $10k → 7%BOLD FUTURES: $20k → 14%BOLD FUTURES: $13k → 14%POSSIBILITY LABS: $75k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS: $10k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS: $8k → 10%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $33k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $30k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $30k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $30k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $20k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $20k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $10k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $5k → 8%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND: $5k → 8%THE HIVE: $3k → 22%SERVICE NEVER SLEEPS: $3k → 9%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FDN: $5k → 14%ASIAN AMERICAN LEAD: $3k → 14%STREET SENSE: $1k → 14%TORTURE ABOLITION AND SURVIVORS SUPPORT COALITION INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Weissberg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Weissberg Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 79 repeat orgs$7.3M to everyone else

79 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 77 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
133

Total granted

$13M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+46%

Still filing today

66%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BELOIT COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +6%
  • NV
    NEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $809k · revenue +19%
  • TC
    The Commonwealth Institute for
    5× · 2020–2024 · $528k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IF
    IF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $330k · revenue -32%
  • TS
    THE STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
2
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
3
Colorofchangeorg

Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…

—
4
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
5
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
6
Justice Policy Institute

The Justice Policy Institute is dedicated to reducing the use of incarceration and involvement in the justice system by promoting fair and effective policies.

Crime & Legal
7
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
8
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
9
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
10
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
11
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
12
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink; the most unlike its peers is Landberry Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

186 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 186 of the 300 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
179/186
Grantees still filing
107/186
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAKASEC: $378,000 · OtherCASA INC: $363,500 · OtherThe Commonwealth Institute for: $528,000 · OtherThe Commonwealth Institute forIF FOUNDATION: $330,000 · Other+118 more: $7,914,425 · Other+118 moreBELOIT COLLEGE: $3,214,750 · EducationBELOIT COLLEGEPROTEUS FUND INC: $160,000 · Education+8 more: $522,500 · Education+8 moreNEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY: $808,500 · Civil RightsNEW VIRGINIA…DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $292,700 · Civil RightsDEFENDING RI…Virginia Civic Engagement Table: $150,000 · Civil RightsVirginia Civ…THE AFRICAN AMERICAN POLICY FORUM INC: $112,500 · Civil RightsTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $107,500 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $90,000 · Civil Rights+11 more: $500,000 · Civil Rights+11 moreWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $362,500 · Arts & CultureWoolly Mam…BLACK IN APPALACHIA: $175,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK IN A…ADVENTURE THEATRE INC: $165,000 · Arts & CultureADVENTURE …MOSAIC THEATER COMPANY OF DC: $130,000 · Arts & CultureMOSAIC THE…TENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED: $121,000 · Arts & CultureTENANTS AN…SHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC: $115,000 · Arts & CultureSHOUTMOUSE…THE JXN PROJECT: $102,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JXN PR…COLLABORATIVE ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureFORWARD IMPACT: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureNative American Community Development Institute: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE INC: $85,000 · Arts & CultureMonacan Nation Cultural Foundation Inc: $85,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more: $179,500 · Arts & Culture+10 moreVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $525,500 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA COMMUNITY VOICE INC: $275,500 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $110,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $100,000 · Community ImprovementChickahominy Indians-Eastern Division Incorporated: $95,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK FAMILY LAND TRUST INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK: $67,500 · Community ImprovementHAPPILY NATURAL DAY: $60,000 · Community ImprovementEMPOWER DC: $58,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $20,000 · Community ImprovementNEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $200,000 · Human ServicesPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND INC: $183,000 · Human ServicesRAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Human ServicesREPOWER FUND: $100,000 · Human ServicesPOSSIBILITY LABS: $93,000 · Human ServicesJust Harvest: $85,000 · Human ServicesBOLD FUTURES NM: $57,500 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND: $360,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $183,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $157,500 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS: $62,500 · Philanthropy+4 more: $32,000 · Philanthropy
Other$9,513,925Education$3,897,250Civil Rights$2,261,200Arts & Culture$1,920,500Community Improvement$1,386,500Human Services$838,500Philanthropy$795,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $3,214,750 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY: $808,500 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetThe Commonwealth Institute for: $528,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $525,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCASA INC: $363,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $362,500 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND: $360,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetIF FOUNDATION: $330,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMARIJUANA JUSTICE: $300,500 over 3y, 42% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $292,700 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetNOLEF TURNS: $291,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetVIRGINIA COMMUNITY VOICE INC: $275,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY: $251,500 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetTHE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC: $213,500 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $209,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FOR KIDS: $207,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetIDENTITY INC: $205,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetNEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $200,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetINDIGENOUS CONSERVATION COUNCIL: $200,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $183,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND INC: $183,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetBLACK IN APPALACHIA: $175,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetADVENTURE THEATRE INC: $165,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $160,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $157,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVirginia Civic Engagement Table: $150,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPROGRESS NOW EDUCATION: $135,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetVirginia Interfaith Center For Public Policy: $130,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetMOSAIC THEATER COMPANY OF DC: $130,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED: $121,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetSHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC: $115,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND: $115,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE AFRICAN AMERICAN POLICY FORUM INC: $112,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $110,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $107,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC: $107,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSylvia Rivera Law Project Inc: $107,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTHE JXN PROJECT: $102,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAY TO RISE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE ARTS: $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetWe the People MI: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFORWARD IMPACT: $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY ↗
  • Who funds The Commonwealth Institute for ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds IF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIJUANA JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NOLEF TURNS ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA COMMUNITY VOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds IDENTITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS CONSERVATION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK IN APPALACHIA ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Virginia Civic Engagement Table ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESS NOW EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Virginia Interfaith Center For Public Policy ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC THEATER COMPANY OF DC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN STEWARDS ↗
  • Who funds TENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eugene & Agnes E Meye…Greater Washington Co…The Morris and Gwendo…If FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundThe Community Foundat…Richmond Memorial Hea…Humanities Council of…NEO Philanthropy IncUnited Way of the Nat…Dimick Foundation Joh…
Eugene & Agnes E Meyer FoundationDC69.8× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · If Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · The Community Foundation Inc · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Humanities Council of Washington DC · NEO Philanthropy Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weissberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weissberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • World Arts Focus: 100% of income from government
  • Maryland Coalition Against Sexual Assault: 21% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Identity Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Round House Theatre Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Adventure Theatre Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weissberg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Weissberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 300 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weissberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home