Skip to content
Weintraub Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Weintraub Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$255k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$146k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.8MReligion$323kCivil Rights$232kPhilanthropy$144kEducation$133kPublic Benefit$127kArts & Culture$95kCommunity Improvement$52kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $146k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$428k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$146,450
NATIONAL YIDDISH THEATRE FOLKSBIENE$25,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$16,600
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CHABAD OF THE WEST SIDE$13,644
TEMPLE ISRAEL CENTER$13,115
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$5,000
CHABAD-LUBAVITCH$5,000
ZAMIR FUND$5,000
TIKVAH FUND$2,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$1,800
ST BALDRICKS CANCER RESEARCH$1,000
CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF EXCHA: $500 → 20%JJC OF MID-WESTCHESTER: $1k → 9%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
AZ
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 24% of Weintraub Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 30%.

Weintraub Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 61% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 30 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
45

Total granted

$2.7M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+52%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +53%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $137k · revenue +39%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $36k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $72k · revenue +304%
  • CH
    CHABAD HOUSE OF HARVARD SQUARE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $38k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR PEACE THROUGH CULTURE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
5
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
The Jerusalem Connection
—
9
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
12
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westchester Jewish Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
32/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,629,018 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES+6 more: $61,100 · InternationalIndividual grant recipient: $181,149 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WEST SIDE INC: $123,440 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WEST SIDE INCTEMPLE ISRAEL CENTER: $110,675 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL CENTERHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION: $100,000 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE …ELNET - EUROPEAN LEADERSHIP NETWORK STRENGTHENS RELATIONS BETWEEN EUROPE &: $72,694 · OtherELNET - EUROPEAN LEADERSHIP NETWORK ST…TURNING POINT USA INC: $72,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCELNET - EUROPEAN LEADERSHIP NETWORK: $54,540 · OtherELNET - EUROPEAN LEADERSHIP NETWORKIndividual grant recipient: $51,360 · OtherNATIONAL YIDDISH THEATRE FOLKSBIENE: $43,900 · OtherMOSAIC: $41,649 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE OF HARVARD SQUARE INC: $38,009 · Other+49 more: $125,010 · Other+49 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $136,940 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $54,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTURNING POINT INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE HENRY JACKSON SOCIETY INC: $36,000 · Social ScienceZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $18,400 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $1,387 · Arts & CultureFeinstein Health Fund Inc: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $562 · Health
International$1,690,118Other$1,014,426Philanthropy$195,940Human Services$39,000Social Science$36,000Arts & Culture$20,787Health$15,562

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,629,018 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $136,940 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $72,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $36,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HENRY JACKSON SOCIETY INC: $36,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCENTER FOR PEACE THROUGH CULTURE INC: $18,500 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $18,400 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFeinstein Health Fund Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFuente Latina Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $8,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL FERRO VOCAL PROGRAM INC: $6,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetZIONESS MOVEMENT INC: $4,615 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetProject Kesher: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,209 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJCC OF MID-WESTCHESTER NURSERY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLIMMERGLASS OPERA THEATRE INC: $667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $490 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCARSDALE ADULT SCHOOL INC: $450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COUNCIL INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAPAN SOCIETY INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HENRY JACKSON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PEACE THROUGH CULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Feinstein Health Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Fuente Latina Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL FERRO VOCAL PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ZIONESS MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Kesher ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds STUDENT ADVOCACY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundFjcUnited Jewish Appeal-…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Lisa & Michael Leffel…Jewish Federation of …Combined Jewish Phila…Jewish Community Foun…The New York Communit…The KCF Fund IncStanley Marion Paul a…The Gottesman Fund
Jewish Communal FundNY27.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Lisa & Michael Leffell Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The New York Community Trust · The KCF Fund Inc · Stanley Marion Paul and Edward Bergman Family Foundation · The Gottesman Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weintraub Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weintraub Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weintraub Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Weintraub Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weintraub Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home