Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weintraub Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$5.3MEmployment$1.5MEducation$1.2MReligion$543kRecreation & Sports$483kPhilanthropy$203kCivil Rights$151kScience & Tech$107kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $610k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.6M
$25,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$1,440,000
THE VALERIE FUND$750,000
HIRE HEROES USA INC$400,000
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$210,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC (D$200,000
RENAISSANCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$100,000
VILLAGE ACADEMIES NETWORK INC (DBA - HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIES)$50,000
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC$25,000
TRELLIS MANAGEMENT GROUP INC$25,000
WE DEFY$25,000
MEMORIES LIVE FOUNDATION$25,000
SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
CLIFF KEEN WRESTLING CLUB$10,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRELLIS MANAGEMENT GROUP: $25k → 11%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $1k → 8%TRELLIS MANAGEMENT GROUP INC: $25k → 11%CAMP KESEM: $1k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $514 → 14%SUPPLIES FOR SUCCESS INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.3M · 36 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
47

Total granted

$8.3M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+17%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $424k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VALERIE FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +76%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +88%
  • HH
    HIRE HEROES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +284%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL
    one grant, 2024 · $300k
  • UW
    USA WRESTLING ASSOCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $157k
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA
    one grant, 2019 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
4
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
The N 1 Collaborative Inc

To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.

Health
12
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Metro New York and Western New York and the most unlike its peers is The Huntsman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community FederationsPublic University Foundatio…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Animal Rescue and AdoptionRotary Club FoundationsEducation Equity LeadershipYouth Sports Booster Organi…Senior Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsVeteran Support ServicesCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%40%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/53
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,512

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
31/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE VALERIE FUND — $2,314,900 · OtherTHE VALERIE FUNDUNITED JEWISH APPEAL — $300,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEALUSA WRESTLING ASSOCIATION — $232,091 · OtherHARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIES — $212,500 · OtherUSA WRESTLING ASSOCATION — $157,000 · Other+55 more — $1,404,473 · Other+55 moreTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,260,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF P…CO-MANS INC — $100,000 · Health+11 more — $117,559 · HealthHIRE HEROES USA INC — $1,454,000 · EducationHIRE HEROES USA INCLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $850,000 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITY+8 more — $75,690 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropyWILLA'S WISH FOUNDATION INC — $9,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyMEMORIES LIVE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureWe Defy — $55,000 · Recreation & SportsUSTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTRELLIS MANAGEMENT GROUP INC — $50,000 · Human Services+3 more — $3,514 · Human Services
Other$4,620,964Health$2,477,559Education$2,379,690Philanthropy$211,500Arts & Culture$75,000Recreation & Sports$65,000Human Services$53,514

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VALERIE FUND — $2,314,900 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,260,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC — $1,454,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $850,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCO-MANS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $81,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBEYOND TYPE 1 — $63,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWe Defy — $55,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTRELLIS MANAGEMENT GROUP INC — $50,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetMEMORIES LIVE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $26,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA LEG TO STAND ON INC — $16,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC — $15,172 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNEWARK ACADEMY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTARA MILLER MELANOMA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRTUAL ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRIBECA FILM INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF METRO NEW YORK AND WESTERN NEW YORK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERRAZANO ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCamp Kesem National — $1,514 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE YOUTH HOCKEY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRising Star Outreach Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIKVA CORP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL BRIGADES INC — $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC — $259 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SUICIDE HELP CENTER — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds HIRE HEROES USA INC
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds CO-MANS INC
  • Who funds SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEYOND TYPE 1
  • Who funds We Defy
  • Who funds TRELLIS MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
  • Who funds Federation of Jewish Communities of Ukraine INC
  • Who funds MEMORIES LIVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
  • Who funds A LEG TO STAND ON INC
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEWARK ACADEMY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Florin Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weintraub Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 83%
  • Family Connections Inc83% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weintraub Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Weintraub Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph