Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weingartz Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2022
86
Grants FY2022
9
States reached
$1.2M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of Weingartz Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Catholic Foundation Of Michigan, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 12 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Weingartz Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 41 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’20
11
’21
41
’22
12
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

International$4.3MPhilanthropy$4.1MFood & Nutrition$2.3MHuman Services$2.1MReligion$645kHealth$625kCrime & Legal$90kHousing & Shelter$75kOther$0
02FY2022 · 86 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k71 grants · $355k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $435k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.9M
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
International Samiaritain$1,200,000
Food for the Poor$750,000
Catholic Charities of SE Michigan$200,000
Gleaners$110,000
Covenant House of Michigan$75,000
FOCUS$50,000
Food Gatherers$35,000
St Vincent de Paul$30,000
Feeding America West Michigan$25,000
Society of the Propagation of Faith$25,000
Friends of the Master$25,000
MCREST$20,000
Guest House$10,000
Heifer International$10,000
Miles Christi$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Alpha Grand Rapids: $5k → 11%Life Resources of Northern Michigan: $5k → 13%Insight Pregnancy Services: $5k → 13%Alpha Family Services of Greenville: $5k → 15%Life Resources of Northern Michigan: $5k → 20%Our Lady's Inn: $5k → 11%Alpha Family Center of Lowell: $5k → 11%Pregnancy Helpline of St Joseph County: $5k → 13%BUGUMIRO FOUNDATION: $17k → 15%Alpha Family Center: $5k → 11%Pregnancy Aid: $5k → 10%Covenant House of Michigan: $75k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
CA
CO
MO
AR
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 17 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 67 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$9.1M
$625k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+968%

Still filing today

47%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4.3M · revenue +118% · 48% of their budget
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $105k · revenue +4%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN
    3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $450k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • EA
    East African Children's Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +968%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
2
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
3
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
4
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
5
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
6
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
7
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

—
8
Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…

Health
9
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
10
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
11
Hope for Life Pregnancy Care Center

The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies

Health
12
Family Life Services of Washtenaw County

Early pregnancy confirmation and limited ob services, abortion information, adoption (c) prenatal and postnatal supplies (d) postnatal abortion assistance (e) young mothers mentoring.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakeshore Pregnancy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is East African Children's Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
31/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $4,258,362 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL SAMARITANFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,832,199 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC+1 more: $25,025 · InternationalCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $4,038,878 · ReligionCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN+1 more: $75,000 · ReligionCatholic Charities of SE Michigan: $850,000 · OtherCatholic Charities of SE M…HOLY CROSS SERVICES INC: $500,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS SERVICES INCHOLY CROSS MISSIONARIES: $480,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS MISSIONARIESIndividual grant recipient: $450,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $160,030 · OtherST LOUIS CENTER: $150,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL: $130,000 · Other+52 more: $712,500 · Other+52 moreGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $330,000 · Food & NutritionANOTHER WAY PREGNANCY CENTER: $150,000 · HealthGUEST HOUSE INC: $40,000 · HealthLIFEPLAN: $10,000 · Health+8 more: $40,000 · HealthCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $75,000 · Human ServicesBUGUMIRO FOUNDATION UGANDA: $17,000 · Human ServicesLIFE RESOURCES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY AID INC OF EASTERN WAYNE COUNTY: $5,000 · Human ServicesAlpha Family Services of Greenville: $5,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADYS INN: $5,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY HELPLINE OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesALPHA WOMENS CENTER OF LOWELL: $5,000 · Human ServicesAlpha Grand Rapids: $5,000 · Human ServicesALPHA FAMILY CENTER OF NEWAYGO: $5,000 · Human ServicesALPHA FAMILY CENTER OF CEDAR SPRINGS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $100,000 · PhilanthropyBeginnings Care for Life Center: $5,000 · Civil Rights
International$6,115,586Religion$4,113,878Other$3,432,530Food & Nutrition$330,000Health$240,000Human Services$142,000Philanthropy$100,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $4,258,362 over 4y, 48% of budgetCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $4,038,878 over 1y, 44% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,832,199 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC: $500,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $330,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANOTHER WAY PREGNANCY CENTER: $150,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $105,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MASTER INC: $75,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetGUEST HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEast African Children's Fund: $25,025 over 1y, 11% of budgetBUGUMIRO FOUNDATION UGANDA: $17,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFEPLAN: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLIFE RESOURCES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPREGNANCY AID INC OF EASTERN WAYNE COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center of Flint: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAlpha Family Services of Greenville: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE LENNON CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAID FOR WOMEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY LIFE-CARE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPREGNANCY HELPLINE OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetHEARTBEAT OF MONROE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCOMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPREGNANCY HELPLINE OF THREE RIVERS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLIVING WATER WORKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLIFE CHOICES OF CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPREGNANCY SERVICES OF GREATER LANSING: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALPHA WOMENS CENTER OF LOWELL: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetALPHA PREGNANCY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAlpha Grand Rapids: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALPHA FAMILY CENTER OF NEWAYGO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPREGNANCY HELPLINE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBLUE WATER PREGNANCY CARE CENTER DBA SPERO CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR WOMEN PREGNANCY COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBeginnings Care for Life Center: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetALPHA FAMILY CENTER OF CEDAR SPRINGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY CROSS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ANOTHER WAY PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MASTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds East African Children's Fund ↗
  • Who funds BUGUMIRO FOUNDATION UGANDA ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds LIFEPLAN ↗
  • Who funds LIFE RESOURCES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds HELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY AID INC OF EASTERN WAYNE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center of Flint ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT50.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Catholic Foundation of Michigan · Dayenu Foundation Trust · Timothy and Sheila Patton Family Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Peter J & Constance M Cracchiolo Fndn · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weingartz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weingartz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weingartz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Weingartz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weingartz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph