Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weiner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$45kArts & Culture$5kEducation$4kHealth$4kEnvironment$2kFood & Nutrition$2kCivil Rights$1kReligion$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILD HEARTS$1,000
HOLOCAUST CENTER FOR HUMANITY$1,000
HEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER$550
NORTHWEST WAG RESCUE$500
OLD DOG HAVEN$500
NOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATION$500
WASHINGTON STATE ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM$250
PORTUGUESE WATER DOG FOUNDATION INC$250
GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH FOOD BANK$200
HARBOR HISTORY MUSEUM$100
LITTLE FREE LIBRARY$100
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR TACOMA & PIERCE COUNTY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH FOOD BANK: $200 → 9%GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH FOOD BANK: $100 → 9%GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH FOOD BANK: $100 → 9%GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH FOOD BANK: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
CA
UT
TN
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$60k · 27 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$60k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+100%

Still filing today

74%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WILD HEARTS DBA BIALYS WELLNESS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +20%
  • HA
    HEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP
    5× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +531%
  • HC
    Holocaust Center For Humanity
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • YA
    YOUNG AT HEART SENIOR PET ADOPTIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +115%
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL (TACOMA)
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • NT
    NORTHWEST TREK WILDLIFE PARK
    one grant, 2024 · $475

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
2
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
5
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
8
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
9
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
10
Animal Haven Inc

Animal haven is a nonprofit organization that finds homes for dogs and cats throughout the tristate area. it operates out of its adoption center in lower manhattan which has facilities for dog training and grooming as part of the adoption…

Animals
11
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
12
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee and the most unlike its peers is Northwest Wag Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Public Library SupportWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Lgbtq+ Community CentersJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%8%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%28%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr22%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%3%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%43%10–20yr15%44%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr22%3%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,334

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILD HEARTS DBA BIALYS WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $17,000 · AnimalsWILD HEARTS DBA BIALYS WELLNESS FOUNDATIONHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP — $5,550 · AnimalsHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFPPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN — $3,425 · AnimalsPASADO'S SAFE HAVENOLD DOG HAVEN — $2,250 · AnimalsOLD DOG HAVENNOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATION — $1,900 · AnimalsNOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATIONYOUNG AT HEART SENIOR PET ADOPTIONS — $1,400 · Animals+7 more — $3,550 · Animals+7 moreHolocaust Center For Humanity — $4,750 · OtherHolocaust Center For HumanityIndividual grant recipient — $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANNE FRANK CENTER — $3,500 · OtherANNE FRANK CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $2,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $1,000 · OtherBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SHELTER — $850 · OtherLAST HOPE K9 — $800 · Other+9 more — $2,495 · Other+9 moreTREVOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Civil RightsCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION — $1,850 · HealthGIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH — $1,500 · Human ServicesWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $950 · EnvironmentTHE MORTON ARBORETUM — $125 · EnvironmentKAVOD CHARTER SCHOOL — $300 · EducationLITTLE FREE LIBRARY — $300 · Education
Animals$35,075Other$20,645Civil Rights$2,000Health$1,850Human Services$1,500Environment$1,075Education$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILD HEARTS DBA BIALYS WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP — $5,550 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity — $4,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN — $3,425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN — $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATION — $1,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION — $1,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH — $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG AT HEART SENIOR PET ADOPTIONS — $1,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST WAG RESCUE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON ST ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM DBA WASART — $750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY FOR TACOMA PIERCE COUNTY SOCIETY PREVENTION CRUELTY ANIMALS — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPortuguese Water Dog Foundation — $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIG HARBOR PENINSULA HISTORICAL SOC — $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKAVOD CHARTER SCHOOL — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE FREE LIBRARY — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLOEDEL RESERVE — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL17.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Grey Muzzle Organization · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weiner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weiner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Weiner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph