Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weidhorn Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$186kRecreation & Sports$57kEducation$32kYouth Development$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kHealth$11kArts & Culture$4kPhilanthropy$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$235k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPING$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$2,500
TEMPLE SHAARI EMETH$1,905
TEMPLE SHALOM$1,800
TEMPLE SINAI$1,800
UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM$1,000
JOY TO THE CHILD INC$500
JEWISH FEDERATION NORTHERN NJ$316
THYMIC MALIGNANCY INTEREST GROUP$180
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$150
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NAPLES FLORIDA$118
TENAFLY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ELIZABETH COATLITION TO HOUSE THE HOMELESS: $1k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MD
KS
TN
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$315k · 23 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
30

Total granted

$315k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+33%

Still filing today

22%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $57k · revenue +374%
  • MT
    MOVING TRADITIONS
    3× · 2018–2021 · $21k · revenue +65%
  • TR
    THE ROCHELLE CENTER
    2× · 2017–2021 · $450 · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • NA
    NEWARK ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +38%
  • NY
    NAPLES YOUTH AVIATION PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • MS
    MORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thread Inc; the most unlike its peers is Naples Youth Aviation Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUTGERS UNIVERSITY HILLEL: $92,500 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY HILLELTEMPLE SHAARI EMETH: $39,149 · OtherTEMPLE SHAARI EMETHIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $16,180 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMAOPA AIR SAFETY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherAOPA AIR SAFETY FOUNDATION INCHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION: $11,860 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,800 · OtherTEMPLE SINAI: $9,503 · Other+31 more: $32,101 · Other+31 moreFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $57,149 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR JE…+1 more: $180 · Youth DevelopmentNEWARK ACADEMY: $16,000 · EducationNEWARK AC…NAPLES YOUTH AVIATION PROJECT INC: $5,000 · EducationNAPLES YO…MORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationMORRISTOW…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES …+2 more: $500 · EducationMOVING TRADITIONS: $20,740 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $1,800 · Arts & CultureZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $150 · Arts & CultureElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human ServicesThe Against Malaria Foundation: $1,000 · HealthCENTRASTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $300 · HealthTexas Heart Institute: $200 · Health
Other$248,093Youth Development$57,329Education$31,500Religion$20,740Arts & Culture$2,950Human Services$2,100Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $57,149 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMOVING TRADITIONS: $20,740 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEWARK ACADEMY: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES YOUTH AVIATION PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetMORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHR SOMAYACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRASTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCHELLE CENTER: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTENAFLY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Crayon Initiative: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Heart Institute: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHREAD INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVING TRADITIONS ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES YOUTH AVIATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Elizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR SOMAYACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRASTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCHELLE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TENAFLY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJNJ21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weidhorn Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weidhorn Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Thread Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Centrastate Medical Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Morristown-Beard School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weidhorn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph