Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wc Gentry Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$70kYouth Development$41kEducation$37kHousing & Shelter$31kRecreation & Sports$25kArts & Culture$19kReligion$16kEnvironment$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$286k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR HOMELESS$18,000
KEY WEST LITERARY SEMINAR$2,500
ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER$1,500
THE ARK WILDLIFE RESCUE$1,000
FL SHERIFFS YOUTH RANCHES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PATRIOT PAWS: $250 → 5%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $250 → 10%LAWTON CHILES FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%KIDS AND CANINES: $250 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%CLARA WHITE MISSION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 8 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
36

Total granted

$167k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+76%

Still filing today

38%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SULZBACHER CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $68k
  • CC
    CITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $35k · revenue -16%
  • IS
    IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $23k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -8%
  • UA
    UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +27%
  • SM
    ST MARYS EPIS CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
2
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
3
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
4
Florida Institute of Technology Inc

Florida institute of technology's mission is to provide high-quality education to a culturally diverse student body in order to prepare students for entering the global workforce, seeking higher-education opportunities, and serving within…

Education
5
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
6
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
7
University of Florida Alumni Association Inc

The mission of the university of florida alumni association, inc. ("association") is to exclusively support and enhance the mission of the university of florida ("university") of pursuing "excellence in education and research and shaping a…

Education
8
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
11
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
12
Flagler Hospital Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kids and Canines Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SULZBACHER CENTER: $68,445 · OtherSULZBACHER CENTERST MARYS EPIS CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherST MARYS EPIS CHURCHDUVAL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,500 · OtherDUVAL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSMARINE SCIENCE RES INSTITUTE: $10,000 · OtherMARINE SCIENCE RES INSTITUTEHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOL GAME CHANGER: $9,500 · OtherHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOL GAME CHANGERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY+24 more: $13,250 · Other+24 moreCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $34,800 · Youth DevelopmentCITRUS COUNTY 4…+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERS…STETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 · EducationSTETSON UNI…+3 more: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsUNIVERSITY…IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $23,000 · Housing & ShelterIM SULZBA…The Lawton Chiles Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $500 · Human ServicesPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $250 · Human ServicesSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $250 · Human ServicesKIDS AND CANINES INC: $250 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 · Human ServicesST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $5,250 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $250 · Environment
Other$139,695Youth Development$35,300Education$27,500Recreation & Sports$25,000Housing & Shelter$23,000Human Services$6,500Environment$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $34,800 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $5,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKEY WEST LITERARY SEMINAR INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS AND CANINES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wc Gentry Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wc Gentry Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Clara White Mission Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Stetson University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wc Gentry Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wc Gentry Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wc Gentry Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph