Skip to content

· Private foundation

Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$86kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$5kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$2kHousing & Shelter$2kHealth$1kCivil Rights$1k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON$9,500
ST PATRICKS FOOD PANTRY$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
POPE SAINT JOHN XXIII SEMINARY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BEAVER BROOK STEP: $500 → 8%BEAVER BROOK STEP: $500 → 8%SPRINGWELL: $500 → 8%SPRINGWELL: $500 → 8%WEST SUBURBAN YMCA: $500 → 8%WEST SUBURBAN YMCA: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 65%.

Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbuslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 17 repeat orgs$600 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$108k
$600

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +133%
  • TJ
    THE JOHN M BARRY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWTON INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • NC
    NEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • EA
    ED AUCOIN SHUTT DETACHMENT FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concord Children's Center Inc

To cultivate an intimate, welcoming community where children develop respectful relationships and inquisitive minds, build confidence in their individual gifts, and are engaged, prepared and inspired to learn.

Human Services
2
Child Care of the Berkshires Inc

The organization provides child care services to families through child care centers and a network of family child care homes. child care of the berkshires also strengthens families through support services and home visiting focused on…

—
3
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
4
United Way of Greater New Bedford Inc

Our mission is to mobilize people, partnerships and resources to catalyze change that strengthens the communities served.

—
5
The University Club of Boston

See schedule o.founded in 1891, the university club is boston's premier social and athletic club. our club offers a warm and inviting atmosphere to its members, families, and guests. we pride ourselves on our sense of community, the…

Recreation & Sports
6
Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

—
7
The Open Center for Children Inc

Since 1972, the open center for children has worked in partnership with families to create a nurturing early education and care experience. the play-based curriculum inspires children to become motivated, self-directed learners, feel…

—
8
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
9
Union Club of Boston Inc

The union club of boston was founded in the year 1863 for the "encouragement and dissemination of patriotic sentiment and opinion, and the condition of membership was "unqualified loyalty to the constitution and the union of the united…

—
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

—
12
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newton Community Service Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Unborn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POPE SAINT JOHN XXIII SEMINARY: $33,850 · OtherPOPE SAINT JOHN XXIII SEMINARYARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON: $19,500 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTONIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL: $9,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCILST PATRICKS FOOD PANTRY: $8,000 · OtherST PATRICKS FOOD PANTRYMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL KOF C: $7,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL KOF CWATERTOWN HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · Other+6 more: $4,175 · OtherBEAVERBROOK STEP INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGWELL INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC: $1,500 · Civil RightsREGIS COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationWATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$102,025Human Services$3,000Civil Rights$1,500Education$1,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOHN M BARRY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWTON INC: $1,275 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAVERBROOK STEP INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS CITIZENS FOR LIFE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREGIS COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGWELL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN M BARRY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAVERBROOK STEP INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS CITIZENS FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGWELL INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Beaverbrook Step Inc: 93% of income from government
  • Springwell Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Newton Community Service Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Watertown Boys and Girls' Club Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Regis College: 2% of income from government
  • West Suburban Young Men's Christian Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus’ filings →

More from the funding graph