Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 94% of WATERTOWN CHARITABLE COUNCIL INC 155KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON$9,500
ST PATRICKS FOOD PANTRY$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
POPE SAINT JOHN XXIII SEMINARY$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BEAVER BROOK STEP: $500 → 8%BEAVER BROOK STEP: $500 → 8%SPRINGWELL: $500 → 8%SPRINGWELL: $500 → 8%WEST SUBURBAN YMCA: $500 → 8%WEST SUBURBAN YMCA: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 65% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbuslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$108k · 17 repeat orgs$600 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$108k
$600

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +133%
  • TJ
    THE JOHN M BARRY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWTON INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • NC
    NEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • EA
    ED AUCOIN SHUTT DETACHMENT FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concord Children's Center Inc

To cultivate an intimate, welcoming community where children develop respectful relationships and inquisitive minds, build confidence in their individual gifts, and are engaged, prepared and inspired to learn.

Human Services
2
Child Care of the Berkshires Inc

The organization provides child care services to families through child care centers and a network of family child care homes. child care of the berkshires also strengthens families through support services and home visiting focused on…

3
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
4
United Way of Greater New Bedford Inc

Our mission is to mobilize people, partnerships and resources to catalyze change that strengthens the communities served.

5
The University Club of Boston

See schedule o.founded in 1891, the university club is boston's premier social and athletic club. our club offers a warm and inviting atmosphere to its members, families, and guests. we pride ourselves on our sense of community, the…

Recreation & Sports
6
Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

7
The Open Center for Children Inc

Since 1972, the open center for children has worked in partnership with families to create a nurturing early education and care experience. the play-based curriculum inspires children to become motivated, self-directed learners, feel…

8
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
9
Union Club of Boston Inc

The union club of boston was founded in the year 1863 for the "encouragement and dissemination of patriotic sentiment and opinion, and the condition of membership was "unqualified loyalty to the constitution and the union of the united…

10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

12
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newton Community Service Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Unborn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

POPE SAINT JOHN XXIII SEMINARY — $33,850 · OtherPOPE SAINT JOHN XXIII SEMINARYARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON — $19,500 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTONIndividual grant recipient — $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL — $9,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCILST PATRICKS FOOD PANTRY — $8,000 · OtherST PATRICKS FOOD PANTRYMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL KOF C — $7,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS STATE COUNCIL KOF CWATERTOWN HIGH SCHOOL — $4,000 · Other+6 more — $4,175 · OtherBEAVERBROOK STEP INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesWEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGWELL INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC — $1,500 · Civil RightsREGIS COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationWATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC — $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$102,025Human Services$3,000Civil Rights$1,500Education$1,000Youth Development$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOHN M BARRY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWTON INC — $1,275 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAVERBROOK STEP INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS CITIZENS FOR LIFE INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREGIS COLLEGE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGWELL INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC
  • Who funds THE JOHN M BARRY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWTON INC
  • Who funds NEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC
  • Who funds BEAVERBROOK STEP INC
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS CITIZENS FOR LIFE INC
  • Who funds REGIS COLLEGE
  • Who funds WEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC
  • Who funds SPRINGWELL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Watertown Charitable Council Inc 155knights of Columbus funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • Beaverbrook Step Inc93% of income from government
  • Springwell Inc68% of income from government
  • Newton Community Service Centers Inc20% of income from government
  • Watertown Boys and Girls' Club Inc3% of income from government
  • Regis College2% of income from government
  • West Suburban Young Men's Christian Association0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph