Skip to content
Wasiullah Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Wasiullah Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$116kHuman Services$10kReligion$3kEducation$450Arts & Culture$200Housing & Shelter$100Public Benefit$100
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $960
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$160k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Aurora Health Care Foundation$10,000
House of Blue Hope$960
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $5k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 4 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$103k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $960 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $81k · revenue -47%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SB
    SAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -50%
  • DM
    DIVINE MERCY PARISH
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
SwedishAmerican Hospital

Through excellence in healthcare and compassionate service, we care for our community.

Health
2
St Mary's Foundation Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
3
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
4
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

—
5
Monmouth Medical Center

To meet the healthcare needs of our community by providing cost-effective quality care. to educate present and future generations of healthcare providers. to provide a continuum of regional tertiary care. please refer to the organization's…

Health
6
Clement Manor Inc

Clement manor is a healthcare organization sponsored by the school sisters of st. francis that is committed to providing a continuum of care and fostering the highest potential for well being of each individual on our campuses and in our…

—
7
Ssm St Clare Health Center Foundation

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of God.

—
8
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
9
St Francis Home of Fond Du Lac Wisconsin Inc

To provide compassionate care that brings hope, health and wholeness to all we serve. the organization provides skilled nursing care, independent living and assisted living facilities. st. francis home is the heart of its care campus.

Health
10
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Rahway

To deliver safe, quality, cost effective healthcare services, providing access and value to the community through a unified effort that meets individual needs with dignity and respect. through its dynamic, strategic partnerships, robert…

Health
11
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
12
Stella Maris Inc

In the tradition of the sisters of mercy, stella maris provides a comprehensive range of health and housing services for the compassionate care of the elderly, the sick and the dying.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aurora Health Care Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $80,870 · PhilanthropyAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INCSAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · HealthSAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTERAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $15,125 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $7,100 · Human ServicesJEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · Human ServicesDIVINE MERCY PARISH: $1,500 · OtherMKE AIRPORT MEDITATION ROOM INC: $1,000 · OtherHouse of Blue Hope: $960 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $500 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherALVERNO COLLEGE: $350 · EducationMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $200 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC: $100 · Public BenefitSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $100 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$80,870Health$35,125Human Services$8,900Other$4,060Education$350Arts & Culture$200Public Benefit$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $80,870 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $15,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $7,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charit…Baird Foundation IncArchdiocese of Milwau…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Milwaukee Jewish Fede…Greater Milwaukee Fou…American Endowment Fo…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…
Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wasiullah Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wasiullah Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wasiullah Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wasiullah Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wasiullah Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home