· Public charity
Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso
To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in washington; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in washington without regard to race, color, creed, or national origin; and to receive, invest, and disburse funds, and to hold…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $8,210,638 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,894,159 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $683,521 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k4 grants · $625k
- $250k+11 grants · $7.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY | $1,458,660 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTONFRANKLIN COUNTIES | $1,054,609 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND | $1,025,470 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WA | $718,132 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SKAGIT COUNTY | $608,676 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY | $601,049 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THURSTON COUNTY | $580,465 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA | $450,879 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SPOKANE COUNTY | $401,205 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN | $358,392 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BELLEVUE | $328,045 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHEHALISLEWIS COUNTY | $189,943 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY | $182,664 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WHATCOM COUNTY | $177,649 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF YAKAMA NATION | $74,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against -38% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY8× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +93%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +38%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND5× · 2020–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +22%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICAone grant, 2019 · $15k
- DNDFMWR NAF FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE JB LEWIS MCCHORDone grant, 2018 · $12k
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREAone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.
Youth educational purposes
Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
Provide behavioral guidance and promote health, social, educational and vocational development of boys and girls six to eighteen years of age.
To enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.to achieve our mission we offer character building experiences for the youth of washington county through the form of social,…
To provide a safe, fun place where youth are inspired to make healthy, responsible choices.
The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Boys & Girls Clubs of the Olympic Peninsula and the most unlike its peers is The Hope Heart Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THURSTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Spokane County ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LEWIS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of South Puget Sound ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE YAKAMA NATION ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE HEART INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · School's Out Washington · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.