How much does Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso give?

Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso reported 15 itemized grants totaling $8,210,638, out of $8,894,159 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 14 and 17 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (100%), Human Services (0%), Health (0%).

Who are Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Boys and Girls Clubs of Snohomish County ($3.9M), Boys and Girls Clubs of King County ($3.8M), Boys and Girls Clubs of South Puget Sound ($3.7M).

Does Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Boys & Girls Clubs of America, School's Out Washington, M J Murdock Charitable Trust.

Where is Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso based?

Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso is based in WA.

Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso

Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso

To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in washington; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in washington without regard to race, color, creed, or national origin; and to receive, invest, and disburse funds, and to hold…

$8.9M

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$1.5M

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$27MHuman Services$15kHealth$8k

02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 15 grants below total $8,210,638, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,894,159 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $683,521 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

$50k–250k4 grants · $625k
$250k+11 grants · $7.6M

$450,879

Median grant

States reached

$7.1M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY	$1,458,660
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTONFRANKLIN COUNTIES	$1,054,609
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND	$1,025,470
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WA	$718,132
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SKAGIT COUNTY	$608,676
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY	$601,049
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THURSTON COUNTY	$580,465
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA	$450,879
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SPOKANE COUNTY	$401,205
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN	$358,392
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BELLEVUE	$328,045
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHEHALISLEWIS COUNTY	$189,943
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY	$182,664
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WHATCOM COUNTY	$177,649
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF YAKAMA NATION	$74,800

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$27M · 16 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against -38% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$27M

$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%

-38%

Still filing today

88%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHealthOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY
8× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +93%
BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY
8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +38%
BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND
5× · 2020–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +22%

Funded once

BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
one grant, 2019 · $15k
DN
DFMWR NAF FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE JB LEWIS MCCHORD
one grant, 2018 · $12k
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA
one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -38%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Boys Girls Club

—

Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development

Boys & Girls Club of Washington County

Youth educational purposes

—

Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

Youth Development

Boys & Girls Club of Washington County Inc

Provide behavioral guidance and promote health, social, educational and vocational development of boys and girls six to eighteen years of age.

Youth Development

Boys & Girls Club of Washington County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development

The Boys and Girls Club of Washington Co

The bgcwc provides programming to more than 550 youth annually, grades k thru 12, in the areas of character, leadership, social and physical recreation, and performing better in school.

Youth Development

The Boys & Girls Club of Washington County Inc

To enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.to achieve our mission we offer character building experiences for the youth of washington county through the form of social,…

Youth Development

The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

—

Boys & Girls Clubs of Sonoma Valley Boys & Girls Clubs of Sonoma Valley

To provide opportunities for youth to learn and succeed.

Youth Development

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development

Boys and Girls Clubs of the Capital Area

To provide a safe, fun place where youth are inspired to make healthy, responsible choices.

Youth Development

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Southwest Washington; the most unlike its peers is The Hope Heart Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/19

Grantees still filing

15/19

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Youth Development$21,490,612Recreation & Sports$3,781,586Other$2,121,475Health$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA41.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · School's Out Washington · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home