· Public charity
Washington Information Network 2-1-1
Win211 exists to make peoples lives better.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $473k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRISIS CONNECTIONS | $444,039 |
| PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE | $334,748 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $331,537 |
| UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY | $226,316 |
| FRONTIER BEHAVIORAL | $178,237 |
| UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY | $68,192 |
| 211 INFO | $47,501 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
CRISIS CONNECTIONS8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +305%- PFPEOPLE FOR PEOPLE8× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +118%
- VOVolunteers of America Western Washington8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +332%
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.
Family-Driven Community of Support for caregivers of children with a range of behavioral health needs.
To empower and enrich our communities through comprehensive mental health and substance use treatment, one individual at a time.
Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.
West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.
Provide clients with 24 hour care, meet their needs, and give them the feeling of protection and security. we also provide training & support to access our community for developmentally disabled adults.
To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
Chelan Valley Hope is a gross-roots local social services agency 'hub' for compassionate connections and resources since 2009. We empower people to improve their own lives by giving them a hand up; not just a hand-out. We do this by…
United way of central washington gathers together people, ideas and resources to strengthen communities and improve lives.
Provide a safe, healing, and restorative community that empowers long-term transformation through human connection for those recovering from the trauma of homelessness, addictions, and mental health challenges.
To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Washington Information Network 2-1-1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington Information Network 2-1-1. Bigger dots raise more.
- 211INFO: 59% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Washington Information Network 2-1-1’s filings →