Skip to content

· Community foundation

Washington County Community Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to engage people, build resources and strenghten our community.

$901k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.6MArts & Culture$1.0MFood & Nutrition$288kPublic Benefit$271kHuman Services$249kReligion$148kHealth$131kCommunity Improvement$74kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $598,063, the rows itemized in this filing. The $901,307 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $303,244 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $228k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
$13,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC (STEVENS MUSEUM)$133,075
SALEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION$98,060
CITY OF SALEM$94,000
YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$35,875
WEST WASHINGTON SCHOOL CORPORATION$32,592
EAST WASHINGTON DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$25,683
ALIGN SOUTHERN INDIANA$25,000
JACKSON TOWNSHIP VFD$19,095
THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION$18,000
CAST OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$14,869
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA$13,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$12,000
SALEM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$11,394
AWARENESS WASHINGTON COUNTY$10,200
DARE TO CARE FOOD BANK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES: $10k → 12%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $47k → 13%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $38k → 13%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $36k → 13%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $28k → 13%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $12k → 13%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $12k → 13%HOME STRETCH FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 28 repeat orgs$303k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
25

Total granted

$3.6M
$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+18%

Still filing today

43%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $883k · revenue +24% · 77% of their budget
  • WC
    WASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $174k · revenue +90%
  • CA
    Creating Avenues for Student Transformation Inc
    4× · 2019–2024 · $132k · revenue +364%

Funded once

  • LI
    LIFESPRING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue +24%
  • TO
    TREASURER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $29k
  • AF
    AVEDA FREDERICS INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
2
The Washington County Humane Society Inc

Rescue and care for stray or unwanted animals.

Animals
3
Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc

Activities of tcwib include only those specifically designated under the workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa).

Employment
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Wabash County Business Alliance Inc

Together, growing a prosperous wabash county.

—
8
West Central Indiana Economic Development District Inc

Economic development, elderly services and transportation planning

Community Improvement
9
West Virginia University Innovation Corporation

To offer a wide range of strategic partnerships, academia, employment and community opportunities to the state, while promoting innovation and critical thinking within our workforce. Our vision is to catalyze economic growth and improve…

Science & Tech
10
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
11
Community Action Program Inc of Western Indiana

To Develop and Provide resources for the purpose of assisting Low-Income Individuals through a variety of programs in Benton, Fountain, Montgomery, Parke, Vermillion, And Warren Counties in Indiana.

Human Services
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifespring Inc; the most unlike its peers is Washington County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $850,034 · OtherSALEM EDUCATION FOUNDATIONCITY OF SALEM: $272,524 · OtherCITY OF SALEMPURDUE UNIVERSITY GLOBAL INC: $216,000 · OtherPURDUE UNIVERSITY GLOBAL INCWEST WASHINGTON SCHOOL CORPORATION: $195,059 · OtherWEST WASHINGTON SCHOOL CORPORATIONTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $124,400 · OtherSALEM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $111,293 · OtherEAST WASHINGTON SCHOOL CORPORATION: $89,110 · Other+33 more: $511,288 · Other+33 moreWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $882,715 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORI…Creating Avenues for Student Transformation Inc: $131,648 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $52,902 · EducationINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $13,789 · EducationBall State University Foundation Inc: $7,500 · Education+2 more: $13,885 · EducationWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $173,970 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesALIGN SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $100,000 · HealthLIFESPRING INC: $31,000 · HealthDARE TO CARE INC: $50,500 · Food & NutritionWASHINGTON COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $33,685 · Food & NutritionHOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $46,040 · Community ImprovementCASA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INDIANA INC: $15,030 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,369,708Arts & Culture$882,715Education$219,724Human Services$189,970Health$131,000Food & Nutrition$84,185Community Improvement$46,040Crime & Legal$15,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $882,715 over 8y, 77% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $173,970 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetCreating Avenues for Student Transformation Inc: $131,648 over 4y, 10% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $124,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALIGN SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $100,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $52,902 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $50,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $46,040 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $33,685 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetLIFESPRING INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INDIANA INC: $15,030 over 2y, 16% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $13,789 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIVER SERVICES INC: $12,509 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWGU CORPORATION: $7,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $6,845 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $6,200 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHOME STRETCH FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Creating Avenues for Student Transformation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALIGN SOUTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DARE TO CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIVER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hoosier Uplands Economic Development CorporationIN28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hoosier Uplands Economic Development Corporation · Early Learning Indiana Inc · University of Indianapolis · Duke Energy Foundation · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · Centra Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington County Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington County Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Washington County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph