Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Warrior Mensch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$694k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$3.9MReligion$1.5MHealth$853kPhilanthropy$553kArts & Culture$379kInternational$219kYouth Development$218kCrime & Legal$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$817k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$693,900
BASSER CENTER FOR BRCA$500,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$360,000
UJA FEDERATION$100,000
NATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM$35,000
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$25,000
THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NEW YORK CITY$25,000
SCHOOL FOR ETHICS AND GLOBAL LEADERSHIP$25,000
PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION$15,000
PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC$15,000
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE - HANUKKAH ON BROADWAY$10,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
JEWISH LIFE AT DUKE UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $577k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $25k → 17%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%GOODFOUNDATION: $15k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3k → 17%ANSWER THE CALL: $15k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $127k → 17%teak fellowship: $100k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $100k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $100k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $25k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $25k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $10k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
KS
AR
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 27 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
56

Total granted

$4.5M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+31%

Still filing today

85%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +35%
  • TT
    THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $514k · revenue +85%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $228k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $260k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $164k
  • NS
    NATL SEPT 11 MEMORIAL & MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CTR
    one grant, 2022 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

7
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
12
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robin Hood Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Open Mind Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Construc…Youth Sports ProgramsCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr19%34%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%30%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/70
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,690

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/65
Grantees still filing
47/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,329,926 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $1,041,915 · EducationETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOLDUKE UNIVERSITY — $360,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $260,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $200,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INCBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC — $126,000 · EducationThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership — $125,000 · Education+6 more — $120,300 · EducationPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INC — $1,406,590 · OtherPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INCBASSER CENTER FOR BRCA — $500,000 · OtherBASSER CENTER FOR BRCAIndividual grant recipient — $163,963 · OtherUniversity of Michigan — $163,000 · OtherNATL SEPT 11 MEMORIAL & MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CTR — $150,000 · Other+54 more — $790,094 · Other+54 moreTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC — $514,085 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Human Services+3 more — $33,000 · Human ServicesUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $228,000 · PhilanthropySTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $180,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $110,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyHIAS INC — $118,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF PEACE INC — $85,000 · International+4 more — $15,360 · InternationalTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $125,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureOPEN MIND PROJECT — $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NEW 42ND STREET INC — $17,500 · Arts & CultureARTSCONNECTION INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureCRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$3,563,141Other$3,173,647Human Services$577,085Philanthropy$538,000International$218,360Arts & Culture$199,000Crime & Legal$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,329,926 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $1,041,915 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC — $514,085 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $360,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $260,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $228,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $180,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $163,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC — $126,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership — $125,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $125,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHIAS INC — $118,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC — $85,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC — $65,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE REFORM ALLIANCE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetASPHALT GREEN INC — $47,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Ideal School of Manhattan — $31,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NEW YORK CITY AND WESTCHERSTER COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA — $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBRONX BASEBALL DREAMS INC — $19,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetTHE NEW 42ND STREET INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC — $16,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNY POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINFINITE FAMILY — $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY23.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Gray Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Pinkerton Foundation · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · The Tapestry Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Warrior Mensch Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Warrior Mensch Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Warrior Mensch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph