Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Warren Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$802k
Granted FY2018
17
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$155k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Religion$375kHealth$324kEducation$110kPhilanthropy$91kAnimals$80kCrime & Legal$50kRecreation & Sports$28kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2018 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $657k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE JUNALUSKA ASSEMBLY$155,000
CHILDREN'S OF ALABAMA$121,000
UAB SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$100,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA$71,000
BIRMINGHAM ZOO$60,000
ALZHEIMERS OF CENTRAL AL$50,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$50,000
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL$50,000
CANTERBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$30,000
MCCALLIE SCHOOL$25,000
ALTAMONT SCHOOL$25,000
WBHM$25,000
THE WOMEN'S FUND$15,000
SOUTHSIDE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROTARY CLUB OF BIRMINGHAM: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$731k · 9 repeat orgs$309k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$731k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+51%

Still filing today

33%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $283k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationReligionHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Lake Junaluska Assembly Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $310k · revenue +38%
  • TC
    The Children's Hospital of Alabama
    2× · 2017–2018 · $124k · revenue +27%
  • AO
    ALZHEIMERS OF CENTRAL AL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k

Funded once

  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • AK
    ABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +136%
  • RP
    RAILROAD PARK FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
2
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
River Mill Academy

Operation of a north carolina public charter school

Education
5
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

6
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
7
The Webb School

To turn out young people who are tireless workers, and who know how to work effectively; who are accurate scholars; who know the finer points of morals and practice them in their daily living; who are always courteous.

Education
8
Alabama Bankers Association Inc

To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.

9
Appalachian State University Foundation Inc

The appalachian state university foundation exists to support appalachian state university students, faculty, staff and community through the advancement of financial support, stewardship, growth of resources, and advocacy for the…

10
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
11
Ashbrook Independent School

To challenge and nurture academically capable students.

Education
12
The Webb Schools

Webb's mission is to provide a dynamic learning community that nurtures and inspires our students and alumni to think boldly, mindfully, and creatively; act with honor and moral courage; lead with distinction; and serve with a generous…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc and the most unlike its peers is Railroad Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UAB SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $100,000 · OtherUAB SCHOOL OF MEDICINEALZHEIMERS OF CENTRAL AL — $100,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS OF CENTRAL ALBIRMINGHAM ZOO — $80,000 · OtherBIRMINGHAM ZOOCanterbury United Methodist Church — $65,000 · OtherCanterbury United Methodist ChurchCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $50,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATIONWBHM — $25,000 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S FUND — $20,000 · Other+4 more — $40,000 · Other+4 moreLake Junaluska Assembly Inc — $310,000 · ReligionLake Junaluska Assembly IncThe Children's Hospital of Alabama — $123,500 · HealthThe Children…The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc — $71,000 · PhilanthropyABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC — $6,770 · PhilanthropyTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL — $25,000 · EducationTHE ALTAMONT SCHOOL — $25,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationRAILROAD PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE ROTARY CLUB OF BIRMINGHAM INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$530,000Religion$310,000Health$123,500Philanthropy$77,770Education$60,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLake Junaluska Assembly Inc — $310,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama — $123,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALTAMONT SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC — $6,770 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRAILROAD PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROTARY CLUB OF BIRMINGHAM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Dunn-French Foundation · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Arlington Partners Charitable Foundation Inc · Debardeleben Foundation Inc · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Warren Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph