Skip to content

· Private foundation

Waltmar Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$751k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$174k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.9MEducation$1.5MYouth Development$931kHealth$335kEmployment$88kFood & Nutrition$54kEnvironment$35kHousing & Shelter$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $394k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $301k
$16,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERVAL HOUSE$174,000
OLIVE CREST$75,000
SALVATION ARMY$52,000
BOY SCOUTS OF ORANGE COUNTY$44,500
NOVA ACADEMY$43,000
CHOC CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STANTON$25,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$23,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK$20,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY$19,000
THE FRIENDLY CENTER$19,000
GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION$16,000
SANTA ANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$16,000
SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE FOUNDATION$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $877k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERVAL HOUSE: $174k → 10%WATER DROP CA: $5k → 14%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $5k → 13%INTERVAL HOUSE: $109k → 10%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $5k → 13%INTERVAL HOUSE: $80k → 10%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $4k → 13%INTERVAL HOUSE: $80k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $80k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $80k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $80k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $80k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $80k → 10%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $10k → 10%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 37 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
4

Total granted

$4.7M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

57%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • INTERVAL HOUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $843k · revenue +18%
  • OC
    OLIVE CREST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $499k · revenue +158%
  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • OS
    OVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
    one grant, 2024 · $18k · revenue 0%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COASTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +27%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
2
Foundation for California Community Colleges

The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.

Education
3
Long Beach City College Foundation

The foundation's specific and primary purposes are to promote the general welfare of long beach city college by assisting and supporting the attainment of educational, athletic, and cultural goals; by assisting it in fulfilling its role of…

Education
4
Boys & Girls Club of San Fernando Valley

Boys and girls clubs provide a safe place for youth to develop character, leadership, education, career guidance, health, art, sports and fitness while becoming responsible and caring citizens.

—
5
Boys & Girls Club of Laguna Beach

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as healthy, caring, and responsible adults.

Youth Development
6
Boys and Girls Club of Santa Monica Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as caring, responsible, productive citizens.

Youth Development
7
Los Angeles City College Foundation

We are committed to breaking the cycle of poverty and creating programs that drive change. by addressing students' basic needs, including food, housing, utilities, transportation, and healthcare, we enable low-income students to enroll,…

Education
8
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Anaheim-Cypress

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
9
Boys & Girls Club of Pasadena

We enable children and youth in the community, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, healthy, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Diablo Valley

The boys & girls clubs of diablo valley's mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County

Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.

Recreation & Sports
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater San Diego

The mission of the club is to inspire and enable youth to achieve academic success, build good character and responsible citizenship, and make healthy lifestyle choices.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Global Glow. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
19/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $353,200 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBOY SCOUTS OF ORANGE COUNTY: $309,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF ORANGE COUNTYFRIENDLY CENTER INC: $146,000 · OtherFRIENDLY CENTER INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STANTON: $145,300 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STANTONGOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $142,800 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIESFULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $121,000 · OtherFULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATIONCYPRESS COLLEGE: $107,000 · OtherCYPRESS COLLEGERANCHO SANTIAGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $105,000 · OtherRANCHO SANTIAGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTCoast Community College District: $105,000 · OtherCoast Community College DistrictSANTA ANA COLLEGE: $105,000 · OtherSANTA ANA COLLEGEBIG BROTHERSSISTERS OF OC: $68,300 · Other+16 more: $237,600 · Other+16 moreINTERVAL HOUSE: $843,000 · Human ServicesINTERVAL HOUSE+4 more: $36,500 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $375,000 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITYNOVA ACADEMY: $282,000 · EducationNOVA ACADEMYOrange Coast College Foundation: $121,000 · EducationOrange Coast Colleg…+5 more: $74,000 · Education+5 moreOLIVE CREST: $498,700 · HealthOLIVE CRESTCHOC FOUNDATION: $217,300 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATION+1 more: $20,000 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN: $112,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK: $112,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GARDEN GROVE INC: $64,600 · Youth DevelopmentGlobal GLOW: $13,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentIrvine Valley College Foundation: $60,000 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $49,500 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF REFUGEES INC: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,945,700Human Services$879,500Education$852,000Health$736,000Youth Development$306,600Philanthropy$60,000Food & Nutrition$53,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERVAL HOUSE: $843,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $498,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $375,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA ACADEMY: $282,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $217,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDLY CENTER INC: $146,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STANTON: $145,300 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetOrange Coast College Foundation: $121,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $121,000 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN: $112,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK: $112,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GARDEN GROVE INC: $64,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIrvine Valley College Foundation: $60,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $49,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON BEACH TREE SOCIETY INC: $30,100 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGolden West College Foundation: $16,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSANTA ANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION HOPE-NORTH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH SCHOOL INC ACADEMIES FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATER DROP: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF REFUGEES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NOVA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDLY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STANTON ↗
  • Who funds Orange Coast College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GARDEN GROVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Irvine Valley College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON BEACH TREE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Golden West College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SANTA ANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Global GLOW ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOPE-NORTH COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA33.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Foundation for California Community Colleges · Angels Baseball Foundation Inc · Samueli Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Jewish Community Foundation of Orange County · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Waltmar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Waltmar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Waltmar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph