Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wallace W and R Crip Ch Fund Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$443kHealth$205kYouth Development$55kEducation$13kEmployment$5kArts & Culture$798
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$9,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRTH TO FIVE$20,000
ABILITIES RICHMOND INC$17,225
SUNRISE INC$9,750
BRIGHTER PATH INC$9,750
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ABILITIES RICHMOND INC: $17k → 18%ABILITIES RICHMOND: $5k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $10k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $10k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $9k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $8k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $8k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $8k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $8k → 18%BRIGHTER PATH INC: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$708k · 8 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$708k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+76%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SUNRISE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $142k · revenue +6%
  • BP
    BRIGHTER PATH INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $63k · revenue +59%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • RO
    REFUGE OF HOPE OF RICHMONDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • RA
    RICHMOND ART MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $798 · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Riceville Community Daycare Inc
Human Services
2
Hope Inside Inc

Our mission is to create a safe, nurturing environment where each individual can thrive and reach their full potential.

Housing & Shelter
3
Richmond Gymnastics Training Center Inc

Competitive Training in Gymnastics

Recreation & Sports
4
Genesis of Richmond Inc

To service victims of domestic violence and sexual assault by providing services for healing the effects of interpersonal trauma and offering resources to build healthy relationships and life styles.

—
5
Bright Strides Inc

To contribute to the emotional, physical and psychological betterment of mankind by integrating equine assisted psychotherapy, equine assisted learning and related activities with art and other non-traditional therapies to create a…

Health
6
Wylde Horses Therapeutic Riding Facility

To empower individuals of all abilities to achieve physical, emotional, and personal growth through the healing power of horses.

Health
7
Ywca Richmond

Ywca richmond is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
8
Richmond Residential Services Inc

Richmond residential services strives to provide person-centered care for individuals with diverse abilities and support needs, facilitating choice, growth and community participation

Human Services
9
Ride to Walk Inc

Ride to walk's mission is to enhance the lives of children and young adults with neurological disabilities by proving innovative therapeutic horseback riding activities that are recreational in nature and adaptied to the individual's needs…

—
10
Richmond Behavioral Health Foundation

To advocate and seek support for the important work of the richmond behavioral health authority, the statuatorily established public entity responsible for providing mental health, intellectual disabilities, substance abuse and prevention…

Health
11
Wayne Childcare - Rainbow World

Rainbow World Child Development Center will encourage quality childcare for the greater Wayne community. It will stimulate children's social, intellectual, and physical development by utilizing development appropriate learning tools.

Human Services
12
Girls On the Run of Greater Richmond

To inspire girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrise Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abilities Richmond Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACHIEVA RESOURCES CORPORATION INC: $233,243 · Human ServicesACHIEVA RESOURCES CORPORATION INCBIRTH TO FIVE INCORPORATED: $190,968 · Human ServicesBIRTH TO FIVE INCORPORATEDBRIGHTER PATH INC: $63,153 · Human ServicesBRIGHTER PATH INCABILITIES RICHMOND INC: $22,425 · Human ServicesSUNRISE INC: $142,277 · OtherSUNRISE INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY: $36,006 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE CO…DIPLOMAS IN SCHOOL CHILDCARE: $13,360 · OtherDIPLOMAS IN SCHOOL CHILDCARE+3 more: $18,656 · Other+3 moreREFUGE OF HOPE OF RICHMOND: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterRICHMOND ART MUSEUM: $798 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$509,789Other$210,299Housing & Shelter$2,000Arts & Culture$798

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACHIEVA RESOURCES CORPORATION INC: $233,243 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetBIRTH TO FIVE INCORPORATED: $190,968 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetSUNRISE INC: $142,277 over 9y, 10% of budgetBRIGHTER PATH INC: $63,153 over 8y, 12% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY: $36,006 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetREFUGE OF HOPE OF RICHMOND: $2,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRICHMOND ART MUSEUM: $798 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACHIEVA RESOURCES CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTH TO FIVE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTER PATH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ABILITIES RICHMOND INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE OF HOPE OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND ART MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Bank Richmond Inc Community FoundationIN22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Bank Richmond Inc Community Foundation · Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc · United Way of Whitewater Valley Inc · The Paul W Lingle Family Foundation · The Stamm Koechlein Family Foundation co Monica Koechlein · Ronald L McDaniel Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wallace W and R Crip Ch Fund Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wallace W and R Crip Ch Fund Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wallace W and R Crip Ch Fund Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph