Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walker Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$709k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.6MHealth$1.2MReligion$768kEducation$448kHousing & Shelter$425kRecreation & Sports$125kHuman Services$65kInternational$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $330k
  • $250k+1 grant · $709k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAUL'S PANTRY$708,574
WISCONSIN MEDICAL COLLEGE$179,632
EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$100,000
WINDSOR MISSION CHURCH$50,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION$30,000
CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$25,000
ON THE MARK DYSLEXIA CLINIC$15,000
NEIGHBORWORKS$10,000
GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
FROSTY SNOWMOBILE CLUB INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $100k → 8%SMILE TRAIN: $50k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION: $35k → 13%CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25k → 5%WI LUTHERAN SEMINARY: $30k → 6%PAUL'S PANTRY: $709k → 10%WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $172k → 10%FROSTY SNOWMOBILE CLUB INC: $25k → 10%EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $128k → 11%GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25k → 17%BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $25k → 14%MARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $50k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25k → 5%WI LUTHERAN SEMINARY: $25k → 6%PAUL'S PANTRY: $669k → 10%WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $170k → 10%FROSTY SNOWMOBILE CLUB INC: $25k → 10%EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $100k → 11%WISCONSIN MEDICAL COLLEGE: $193k → 17%MARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $25k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%PAUL'S PANTRY: $619k → 10%WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $163k → 10%EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $100k → 11%WISCONSIN MEDICAL COLLEGE: $180k → 17%MARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $25k → 8%PAUL'S PANTRY: $564k → 10%WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $159k → 10%EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $100k → 11%RISEN SAVIOR LUTHERAN: $35k → 17%MARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $25k → 8%PAUL'S PANTRY: $399k → 10%WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $157k → 10%EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $100k → 11%PAUL'S PANTRY: $366k → 10%WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $124k → 10%EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $75k → 11%PAUL'S PANTRY: $360k → 10%WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $108k → 10%EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30k → 11%PAUL'S PANTRY: $326k → 10%PAUL'S PANTRY: $309k → 10%WINDSOR MISSION CHURCH: $50k → 10%CURATIVE CONNECTIONS: $100k → 10%WINDSOR MISSION CHURCH: $35k → 10%NEIGHBORWORKS: $35k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
CA
MO
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 20 repeat orgs$356k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$7.7M
$356k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-11%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionPublic BenefitEducationArts & CultureEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PAUL'S PANTRY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +50%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $290k · revenue +323% · 50% of their budget
  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CC
    CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -42%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Lake Superior Habitat for Humanity

Provide home ownership opportunities to low-income households and make repairs to existing homes for very low-income homeowners.

—
2
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
3
Habitat for Humanity of Wausau Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
4
Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin

Service for disabled adults

Human Services
5
Habitat for Humanity of Wisconsin River Area Inc

Build/remodel homes sold at favorable terms to qualified low-income individuals. also, to operate two retail restore outlets to sell donated building materials.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of West Central Mn

Helping families thrive through affordable homeownership.

—
7
Habitat for Humanity of Wisconsin Inc

Our mission is to empower WI Habitat for Humanity affiliates to create one voice that advocates and influences affordable home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
8
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
9
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
10
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
11
Lakeshore Habitat for Humanity Inc

The organization provides low income qualified families with decent, affordable housing. the support of the local community is enlisted to assist family-partners in the construction of new and rehabilitated homes, which are then sold at…

—
12
Goodwill Industries Development Corporation

Hold title to real estate to further the mission of goodwill industries of north central wisconsin, inc. goodwill ncw is a nonprofit human services organization. its mission is "elevating people by eliminating barriers to employment."

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Medical Society Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is On the Mark Dyslexia Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAUL'S PANTRY INC: $4,319,779 · Food & NutritionPAUL'S PANTRY INCWISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC: $1,054,169 · OtherWISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INCEMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $665,500 · OtherEMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHWISCONSIN MEDICAL COLLEGE: $372,327 · OtherWISCONSIN MEDICAL COLLEGEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $290,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INCMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $225,000 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE+23 more: $800,500 · Other+23 moreWOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · Public BenefitCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $100,000 · EmploymentFROSTY SNOWMOBILE CLUB INC: $57,500 · Recreation & SportsON THE MARK DYSLEXIA CLINIC INC: $45,000 · EducationBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAND O LAKES AREA ARTISANS INC: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Food & Nutrition$4,319,779Other$3,407,496Public Benefit$105,000Employment$100,000Recreation & Sports$57,500Education$45,000Youth Development$25,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $4,319,779 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetWISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC: $1,054,169 over 7y, 33% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $290,000 over 5y, 50% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFROSTY SNOWMOBILE CLUB INC: $57,500 over 3y, 23% of budgetON THE MARK DYSLEXIA CLINIC INC: $45,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLAND O LAKES AREA ARTISANS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FROSTY SNOWMOBILE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ON THE MARK DYSLEXIA CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds BAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LAND O LAKES AREA ARTISANS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kress Foundation IncWI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kress Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd · Feeco International Foundation Inc · Charles Family Foundation Inc · Wochinske Family Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walker Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walker Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Wounded Warriors in Action Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Walker Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Walker Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walker’s filings →

More from the funding graph