Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Wagner Descendant's Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, and maintain the broad, charitable, educational or religious purpose or functions as authorized by the charter of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago and the by-laws of the foundation.

$70k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2023
17%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$70,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$70,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 8
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 17% of the organizations Wagner Descendant's Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 14% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
InternationalPhilanthropyEducation
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$70k0%
FY20236$366k17%
FY20228$284k50%
FY20214$272k100%
FY20202$20kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$764kInternational$562kEducation$30kScience & Tech$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Wagner Descendant's Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago: $395,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWashington Institute for Near East Policy: $302,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFriends of Elnet: $120,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetIsrael Emergency Alliance: $64,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Israel Education Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Entrepreneurial Jewish Philanthropy Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPrager University Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Jewish Day School Endowment Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChicago Jewish Day School: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of MetropolitanIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Wagner Descendant's Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wagner Descendant's Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wagner Descendant's Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Wagner Descendant's Foundation

How much does Wagner Descendant's Foundation give?
Wagner Descendant's Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $70,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 8 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Wagner Descendant's Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (56%), International (41%), Education (2%).
Who are Wagner Descendant's Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago ($395k), Washington Institute for Near East Policy ($302k), Friends of Elnet ($120k).
Does Wagner Descendant's Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Wagner Descendant's Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Federation of Metropolitan, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Wagner Descendant's Foundation based?
Wagner Descendant's Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wagner Descendant's’ filings →

More from the funding graph