Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Wagner Descendant's Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, and maintain the broad, charitable, educational or religious purpose or functions as authorized by the charter of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago and the by-laws of the foundation.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$764kInternational$562kEducation$30kScience & Tech$10k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$70,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$70,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Israel Emergency AllianceStand With Us: $22k → 14%Center for Entrepreneurial Jewish Philanthropy: $8k → 9%American Committee for Weizmann Institute of Science: $10k → 17%American Israel Education Foundation: $50k → 14%Chicago Jewish Day School: $10k → 14%Israel Emergency AllianceStand With Us: $22k → 14%Center for Entrepreneurial Jewish Philanthropy: $8k → 9%Washington Institute for Near East Policy: $182k → 14%Chicago Jewish Day School: $10k → 14%Israel Emergency AllianceStand With Us: $22k → 14%Washington Institute for Near East Policy: $110k → 14%Friends of ELNET: $45k → 14%Prager University Foundation: $10k → 14%Washington Institute for Near East Policy: $10k → 14%Friends of ELNET: $40k → 14%Friends of ELNET: $35k → 14%Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago: $269k → 14%Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago: $205k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $70k → 14%Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago: $60k → 14%Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago: $60k → 14%Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago: $45k → 14%Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$897k · 5 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$897k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’25
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    4× · 2021–2025 · $395k · revenue +33%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ELNET
    3× · 2021–2023 · $120k · revenue +47%
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $65k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -15%
  • FF
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +77%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +112%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
2
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
3
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
7
Friends of Institute for Zionist

The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…

International
8
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

12
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Israel Education Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $395,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $354,446 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO+1 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $302,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICYFRIENDS OF ELNET — $120,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNETISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $64,800 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCEAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $25,000 · International+1 more — $10,000 · InternationalPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $10,000 · Education
Philanthropy$764,446International$571,800Education$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $395,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $354,446 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $302,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET — $120,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $64,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Entrepreneurial Jewish Philanthropy Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of MetropolitanIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wagner Descendant's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wagner Descendant's Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wagner Descendant's Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph