· Private foundation
W G Christianson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $280k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $340k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY | $80,000 |
| ANNUCIATION SCHOOL OF CHURCH | $75,000 |
| HOPE ACADEMY INC | $75,000 |
| MONTESSORI CENTER OF MN | $60,000 |
| JEREMIAH PROGRAM | $50,000 |
| WAY TO GROW | $40,000 |
| ABRIA PREGNANCY RESOURCES | $40,000 |
| MARTHA'S VILLAGE & KITCHEN | $35,000 |
| NPH USA | $30,000 |
| SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN | $30,000 |
| PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING | $25,000 |
| OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH AND SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| SACRED HEART | $20,000 |
| FRANCISCAN UNIV OF STUBENVILLE | $15,000 |
| ETERNAL WORLD TELEVISION NETWORK (EWTN) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY7× · 2017–2025 · $425k · revenue +48%
- HAHOPE ACADEMY INC7× · 2019–2025 · $321k · revenue +213%
- ULUNIVERSITY LIFE-CARE CENTER INC8× · 2017–2025 · $206k · revenue +1%
Funded once
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +213%- CBCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXASone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -34%
- NNEEFone grant, 2019 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.
To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
We empower individuals and families to confidently navigate aging so that it is a purposeful journey filled with dignity and support.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.
The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
We are called to strengthen communities by empowering people to respond to life's challenges.
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Christopher N Mitropoulos Memorial Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY LIFE-CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF VIRTUE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PERSPECTIVES INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗
- Who funds CENTRO TYRONE GUZMAN ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
- Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
- Who funds GALILEE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MWANA VILLAGES US INC ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY SCHOOL OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY ↗
- Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTHLINK ↗
- Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Engelsma Family Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Kimley-Horn Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · United Way Worldwide · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization W G Christianson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to W G Christianson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to W G Christianson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.