Skip to content

· Private foundation

W D & Shirley Schafer-Ray Educational Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$313k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$779kHealth$1k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $128k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southwestern Community College$128,200
Iowa State University$47,500
University of Memphis$31,300
Northwest Missouri State University$21,000
University of Northern Iowa$16,000
University of Iowa$15,000
Central College$11,000
Arkansas State University$10,000
South Dakota State University$4,000
Simpson College$4,000
University of Kansas$3,000
Drake University$3,000
Allen College$3,000
Des Moines University$3,000
The University of Texas at Dallas$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Creighton University: $3k → 12%University of Nebraska - Lincoln: $9k → 13%Northeast Community College: $1k → 13%Wayne State College: $1k → 13%Northwest Lineman College: $1k → 8%University of Pittsburg: $3k → 11%Pennsylvania State University: $3k → 16%The University of Texas at Dallas: $3k → 14%Oklahoma State University: $9k → 19%Arkansas State University: $10k → 17%Des Moines University: $10k → 5%Simpson College: $10k → 6%Central College: $11k → 8%Kirkwood Community College: $5k → 9%Waldorf University: $1k → 10%Buena Vista University: $10k → 10%Drake University: $8k → 10%Columbia College: $5k → 11%Iowa Central Community College: $2k → 13%Southwestern Community College: $128k → 13%Morningside University: $5k → 13%Southeastern Community College: $3k → 15%University of Iowa: $15k → 15%Allen College: $3k → 17%Graceland University: $4k → 18%University of Kansas: $3k → 15%William Jewel Colleg: $3k → 8%Northwest Missouri State University: $21k → 17%University of Memphis: $31k → 17%Salve Regina University: $10k → 7%South Dakota State University: $6k → 13%Univership of Nebraska Lincoln: $3k → 13%Des Moines University: $3k → 5%Simpson College: $4k → 6%Drake University: $7k → 10%Columbia College: $3k → 11%Southwestern Community College: $115k → 13%University of Iowa: $13k → 15%University of Kansas: $3k → 15%Northwest Missouri State University: $9k → 17%University of Memphis: $29k → 17%South Dakota State University: $4k → 13%Simpson College: $3k → 6%Drake University: $3k → 10%Southwestern Community College: $74k → 13%Northwest Missouri State University: $7k → 17%University of Memphis: $17k → 17%Grandview University: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
SD
IA
PA
RI
CA
NE
MO
KS
AR
TN
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$683k · 14 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$683k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+8%

Still filing today

29%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’24’25
EducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +1%
  • SC
    Simpson College
    3× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +28%
  • Buena Vista University
    2× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
4
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
5
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
University of Rio Grande

The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is William Jewell College; the most unlike its peers is Central College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Southwestern Community College: $317,550 · OtherSouthwestern Community CollegeIowa State University: $111,250 · OtherIowa State UniversityUniversity of Memphis: $76,700 · OtherUniversity of MemphisNorthwest Missouri State University: $36,750 · OtherUniversity of Iowa: $28,000 · OtherUniversity of Northern Iowa: $25,000 · Other+22 more: $95,000 · Other+22 moreDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $17,750 · EducationDRAKE UNIVER…Simpson College: $17,000 · EducationSimpson Coll…CENTRAL COLLEGE: $11,000 · EducationCENTRAL COLL…Buena Vista University: $11,000 · EducationBuena Vista …SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationSALVE REGINA…GRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationGRACELAND UN…MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationMORNINGSIDE …Creighton University: $3,000 · EducationWilliam Jewell College: $3,000 · EducationGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,000 · EducationMERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $1,000 · Religion
Other$690,250Education$88,750Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $17,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSimpson College: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuena Vista University: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Jewell College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Simpson College ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Buena Vista University ↗
  • Who funds SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GRACELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds William Jewell College ↗
  • Who funds GRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bestenlehner D and F Educational TrMO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr · Dean J King Family Foundation · Ottumwa Regional Legacy Foundation Inc · Snyder-Vaughn Trust Funds · Gwendolyn and Lucian L Hinecker Scholarship Trust · Willard E and Ella P Thompson Educational Fund · Fahrney Education Fdtn Trust · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · United Way Worldwide · Meyerhoff Charitable Trust · Moore Scholarship Trust · Marguerite V Brown

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W D & Shirley Schafer-Ray Educational Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W D & Shirley Schafer-Ray Educational Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W D & Shirley Schafer-Ray Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph