Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vukasin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$74kHuman Services$3kHealth$3kReligion$1kArts & Culture$683Youth Development$300Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$420k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL$3,000
CHIST HAVEN FOR CHILDREN$1,000
MORAGA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
WHITES CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
COMMUNITY STORE HOUSE$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BRICKS$565
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BRICKS: $565 → 8%SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $3k → 9%THE MARTIN C KAUFFMAN 100 CLUB OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $683 → 10%WHITES CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 11%REACH OUT AND READ: $1k → 12%FOUR WINDS WESTWARD HO: $300 → 10%Grounds for Health: $3k → 10%SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $3k → 9%UC Berkeley Foundation: $15k → 10%CHIST HAVEN FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%Martin C Kauffman One Hundred Club: $1k → 9%PIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%COMMUNITY STORE HOUSE: $1k → 11%THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $1k → 9%Piedmont Education Foundation: $3k → 10%Moraga Education Foundation: $4k → 9%Piedmont Education Foundation: $2k → 10%Moraga Education Foundation: $4k → 9%THE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $20k → 10%MORAGA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%THE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $20k → 10%MORAGA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%THE COLLEGE PREPATORY SCHOOL: $1k → 10%MORAGA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%MORAGA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%MORAGA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 4 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$73k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    3× · 2019–2022 · $41k · revenue +44%
  • ME
    Moraga Education Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +35%
  • PE
    PIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • UB
    UC Berkeley Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • GF
    GROUNDS FOR HEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +41%
  • TM
    The Martin C Kauffman One Hundred Club of Alameda Countygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +127%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
The Childrens Scholarship Fund

The Children's Scholarship Fund (CSF) empowers families by providing children in need with scholarships, and by supporting expanded educational opportunities for all children.

Education
5
Cherry Hills Christian School

Cherry Hills Christian School awakens the educational experience by preparing students to live fully for God in a rapidly changing world, knowing they are His masterpieces, uniquely designed for His purpose.

Education
6
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
7
Redwood Cooperative School

Education Preschool Through Eight Grade

Education
8
Pacific Crest Montessori School

Pcs operates a school specifically designed to meet the development needs of the child from preschool through middle school, in accordance with the principles and education of human development taught by maria montessori.

—
9
Creekside Charter Management

To cultivate student success through mindful perseverance, critical thinking, resourcefulness and advanced knowledge that will prepare students for high levels of success in school, work, and life, while honoring the individuality and…

Education
10
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
11
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
12
The California Education Partners

California education partners seeds and grows collaborations among california's school systems, so that they innovate, improve, and build internal capacity as learning organizations in order to close gaps and lead high performing,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piedmont Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Grounds for Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $41,000 · EducationTHE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOLMoraga Education Foundation: $16,200 · EducationMoraga Education FoundationPIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,366 · EducationPIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION+1 more: $200 · EducationUC Berkeley Foundation: $15,000 · OtherUC Berkeley FoundationTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $7,000 · OtherTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOLThe Martin C Kauffman One Hundred Club of Alameda County: $1,413 · OtherChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $1,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $1,000 · OtherREACH OUT AND READ: $1,000 · OtherWHITES CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCH: $1,000 · Other+2 more: $1,248 · OtherGROUNDS FOR HEALTH INC: $2,500 · HealthFOUR WINDS: $300 · Recreation & Sports
Education$65,766Other$28,661Health$2,500Recreation & Sports$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $41,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMoraga Education Foundation: $16,200 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,366 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROUNDS FOR HEALTH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Martin C Kauffman One Hundred Club of Alameda County: $1,413 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR WINDS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · United Way Worldwide · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vukasin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vukasin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vukasin Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vukasin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vukasin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph