· Public charity
Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC
The organization is a supporting organization to seven specified public charities and organizations supported by these charities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $875,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,029,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $154,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $500k
- $250k+1 grant · $340k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDUS EDUCATIONAL AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC | $340,000 |
| CHINMAYA MISSION OF ORLANDO INC | $100,000 |
| HINDU UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA | $100,000 |
| EKAL VIDYALAY FOUNDATION OF USA | $100,000 |
| TEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE | $100,000 |
| HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| ARYA PRATHINIDHI SABHA AMERICA | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HUHindu University of America7× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue ×19 · 55% of their budget
- IEINDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC4× · 2019–2024 · $640k · revenue +487% · 36% of their budget
- EVEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA6× · 2019–2024 · $353k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- CECHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -25%
- HSHINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +69%
- SISewa International Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Foster teachings of hindu religion
To serve atlanta area hindu community to celebrate hindu culture
Hindu temple
To construct and maintain a hindu temple in the state of maryland. to promote and practice the ideals of hindusim and the hindu religion through worship, social service, education and teaching. to strive for spiritual richness and human…
Promote the universal message of hinduism, protect civil rights, promote justice, and empower hindu americans through mutual support.
World hindu foundation of america, inc. endeavors to promote networking amongst practitioners of sanatan hindu dharma through community-oriented social, spiritual, cultural, intellectual and educational activities.
Promote hindu religion
GHHF has 175 Sunday School centers India .Grants were give for education, reconstruction and renovation of Hindu Temples. Provided vocational training for underpriviledged. Provided free meals to needy. Flood relief, medicines and baby…
to promote and practice the ideals of Hindu religion through worship, education, and cultural activities, while striving for spiritual richness and human excellence
Hindu religious education. our most significant activities include: hinduism today magazine, creation, sales and giveaway of our hindu publications, lectures, travel study programs and other education programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hindu American Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ginsburg Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hindu University of America ↗
- Who funds INDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds CHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO ↗
- Who funds CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE ↗
- Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC ↗
- Who funds ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC ↗
- Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
- Who funds Mother Miracle ↗
- Who funds Ginsburg Family Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE KEY CLUBHOUSE OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CHURCH OF THE GOLDEN SAVIOR INC ↗
- Who funds GUJARATI SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bhutada Family Foundation · Saraiya Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ginsburg Family Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC?
Find your warmest path to Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.