Skip to content
Vivek Garipalli Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Vivek Garipalli Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$825kHealth$380kPhilanthropy$32kRecreation & Sports$15kYouth Development$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kInternational$10kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BOWERY MISSION$100,000
HAMPTON CLASSIC HORSE SHOW$26,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INDIA YOUTH FUND: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CA
NC
SC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+19%

Still filing today

60%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyReligionRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Christian Herald Association Inc
    4× · 2018–2025 · $825k · revenue +46%
  • CH
    CAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $300k · revenue -6%
  • SH
    SOUTH HAMPTON VILLAGE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $11k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • NH
    Nautilus Health Institute
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +25% · 33% of their budget
  • PE
    POP EARTH CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Garnet Health

To maintain an integrated health delivery system of providers and hospitals resulting in improved health for our community by providing exceptional healthcare to our patients.

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
4
Bronson Health Foundation

As the philanthropic arm of the bronson healthcare system, bronson health foundation builds relationships with individuals and organizations to connect their generous support with bronson's healing missions.

Health
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
Global Health Corps Inc

The organization's mission is to develop a strong and diverse network of young changemakers to transform health systems. the organization envisions a world where every person lives a healthy, dignified life.

Health
7
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
8
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

—
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
The Scga Foundation

The mission of the scga junior golf foundation is to develop an inclusive golf community that enables kids to thrive on and beyond the course. we believe that every kid in southern california, no matter their circumstance, should have the…

Recreation & Sports
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Banner Health Foundation

Established in 2001, banner health foundation secures and stewards charitable contributions to advance banner health's mission, investing in facilities and programs that support advancements in care, research, medical education, patient…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carepoint Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shinnecock Golfers Association Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Christian Herald Association Inc: $825,000 · ReligionChristian Herald Association IncCAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · HealthCAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION I…Nautilus Health Institute: $50,000 · HealthNautilus Health InstitutePOP EARTH CORPORATION: $19,000 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual …THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $11,421 · OtherTHE MARFAN …SOUTH HAMPTON VILLAGE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE: $11,100 · OtherSOUTH HAMPT…Individual grant recipient: $8,796 · OtherIndividual …SHINNECOCK GOLFERS ASSOCIATION SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $3,850 · OtherHAMPTON CLASSIC HORSE SHOW INC: $26,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyOHOOPEE MATCH CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentINDIA YOUTH FUND: $10,000 · Human ServicesORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Religion$825,000Health$369,000Other$140,167Philanthropy$31,500Youth Development$20,000Human Services$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $825,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNautilus Health Institute: $50,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetHAMPTON CLASSIC HORSE SHOW INC: $26,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOP EARTH CORPORATION: $19,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $11,421 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHOOPEE MATCH CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIA YOUTH FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHINNECOCK GOLFERS ASSOCIATION SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vivek Garipalli Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vivek Garipalli Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vivek Garipalli Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Vivek Garipalli Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vivek Garipalli Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home