Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vit Ivano P Irrev Trust Tai

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$321k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$94kHealth$76kHousing & Shelter$53kYouth Development$53kReligion$36kHuman Services$33kArts & Culture$31kEducation$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$22,426
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VISITING NURSE & HOSPICE CARE$38,301
GIRLS INC OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA$38,301
PATH$38,301
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES$22,426
SANTA BARBARA ROTARY CHARITABLE FND$22,426
SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$22,426
SANTA BARBARA HISTORICAL MUSEUM$22,426
ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF SB$22,426
SANTA BARBARA TRUST$22,426
SANTA MARIA IN SYLVIS ABBAZIA$22,426
FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$22,426
IMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY$13,100
SANSUM CLINIC PLANNED GIVING$13,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $22k → 14%PATH SANTA BARBARA: $5k → 14%PATH SANTA BARBARA: $5k → 14%PATH SANTA BARBARA: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$403k · 11 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$403k
$2k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PATH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +33%
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +8%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • ID
    IHC DBA LA CASA DE MARIA
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
2
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Scan Health Plan

Scan's mission is to keep seniors healthy and independent.

Health
5
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
6
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

—
7
Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Burbank Housingsr Corporation

To own and operate affordable rental housing.

—
9
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
10
Community Corporation of Santa Monica

Community corporation of santa monica was formed to improve lives and neighborhoods by restoring, building, and managing affordable housing for people of modest means.

Housing & Shelter
11
Memorial Hospital Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

—
12
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Inc; the most unlike its peers is Path. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VISITING NURSE & HOSPICE CARE: $53,301 · OtherVISITING NURSE & HOSPICE CAREGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $53,301 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARASANTA BARBARA TRUST: $31,426 · OtherSANTA BARBARA TRUSTSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $31,426 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INCITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF SB: $31,426 · OtherITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF SBSANTA MARIA IN SYLVIS ABBAZIA: $22,426 · OtherSANTA MARIA IN SYLVIS ABBAZIAIMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY: $13,100 · OtherIMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY+1 more: $2,000 · OtherPATH: $53,301 · Human ServicesPATHCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $31,426 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF…SANTA BARBARA ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $31,426 · Community ImprovementSANTA BARBARA HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $31,426 · Arts & CultureFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $31,426 · Food & NutritionSANSUM CLINIC: $23,100 · Health
Other$238,406Human Services$84,727Community Improvement$31,426Arts & Culture$31,426Food & Nutrition$31,426Health$23,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATH: $53,301 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $53,301 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $31,426 over 4y, 24% of budgetSANTA BARBARA HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $31,426 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $31,426 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $31,426 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $23,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vit Ivano P Irrev Trust Tai funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vit Ivano P Irrev Trust Tai. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vit Ivano P Irrev Trust Tai’s filings →

    More from the funding graph