Skip to content

· Public charity

Virginia New Majority Education Fund

New Virginia Majority Education Fund is a grassroots organization that engages low income people and people of color in local communities through leadership development, trainings and workshops, issue education through grassroots organizing and citizenship development through naturalization assistance and clinics, civic engagement, voter…

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$901kPublic Benefit$370kArts & Culture$319kHuman Services$141kEnvironment$108kEducation$101kCommunity Improvement$85kCrime & Legal$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$110,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tenants and Workers United$110,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights: $123k → 6%BPSOS Inc: $51k → 6%BPSOS Inc: $50k → 6%BPSOS: $20k → 6%BPSOS Inc: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
CA
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 13 repeat orgs$477k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

$1.6M
$477k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-28%
+210%

Still filing today

92%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED
    7× · 2017–2024 · $697k · revenue +668% · 33% of their budget
  • PN
    PROGRESS NOW EDUCATION
    3× · 2019–2022 · $190k · revenue +423%
  • PB
    PRIO BANGLA INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $147k · revenue +44% · 94% of their budget

Funded once

  • VC
    Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rightsgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $123k · revenue +469%
  • UP
    UNITED PARENTS AGAINST LEAD - UPALgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $108k · revenue +347%
  • CF
    CAROLINA FEDERATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +210%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia New Majority Education Fund

New Virginia Majority Education Fund is a grassroots organization that engages low income people and people of color in local communities through leadership development, trainings and workshops, issue education through grassroots…

Education
2
Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy

Working within the faith community to educate and mobilize citizen to create systemic social change for low income Virginians.

—
3
Caaav Voice Inc

CAAAV Voice is a grassroot organization aiming to empower Asian immigrant communities by organizing against gentrification, tenant rights and promote social justice.

—
4
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
5
Virginia Coalition for Progressive Values

To establish an effective, long-term and resilient political infrastructure that advocates for and delivers public policy victories which reflect the values held in common by our members.

—
6
Virginia Afl-Cio

The Virginia AFL-CIO monitors all legislation affecting the working people of Virginia. To keep the state's labor standards on a progressive track for all working people, we work to win the fight against passage of laws that would have a…

Employment
7
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
8
Vietnamese American Roundtable

The Vietnamese American Roundtable (VAR) envisions a strong and unified Vietnamese American community that works towards improving our quality of life. To this end, VAR focuses our mission to organize, advocate, and educate our community.…

Community Improvement
9
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
10
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…

Human Services
11
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
12
Organize for Justice

Organize for justice develops diverse campaign leadership by passing on innovations and relationships from one generation of organizers to the next. the organization strives to create public support on issues affecting working americans.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tenants and Workers United; the most unlike its peers is Prio Bangla Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED: $696,610 · Arts & CultureTENANTS AND WORKERS UNITEDPROGRESS NOW EDUCATION: $190,000 · OtherPROGRESS NOW EDUCATIONPRIO BANGLA INC: $147,470 · OtherPRIO BANGLA INCWashington Community Action Network Education & Research Fund: $71,000 · OtherWashington Community Actio…CASA INC: $30,000 · OtherCASA INCCtr for Race Rel Econ Democracy: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $19,000 · OtherBOAT PEOPLE S O S INC: $141,000 · Human ServicesBOAT PEOPLE S …Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights: $122,646 · Human ServicesVirginia Coali…CAROLINA FEDERATION: $49,500 · Civil RightsCAROLINA FE…NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOC: $40,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL FE…NEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY: $36,000 · Civil RightsNEW VIRGINI…Sikh American Legal Defense & Education: $31,000 · Civil RightsSikh Americ…NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL KO…DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $15,500 · Civil RightsDEFENDING R…TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND: $42,500 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $42,500 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $40,792 · Community ImprovementUNITED PARENTS AGAINST LEAD - UPAL: $108,173 · EnvironmentGrassroots Collaborative: $58,500 · EducationWe the People MI: $42,500 · EducationTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND: $42,500 · Public BenefitKENTUCKY COALITION INC: $42,500 · Public Benefit
Arts & Culture$696,610Other$482,470Human Services$263,646Civil Rights$202,000Community Improvement$125,792Environment$108,173Education$101,000Public Benefit$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED: $696,610 over 7y, 33% of budgetPROGRESS NOW EDUCATION: $190,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetPRIO BANGLA INC: $147,470 over 5y, 94% of budgetBOAT PEOPLE S O S INC: $141,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWashington Community Action Network Education & Research Fund: $71,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetGrassroots Collaborative: $58,500 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetCAROLINA FEDERATION: $49,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND: $42,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWe the People MI: $42,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND: $42,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $42,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC: $42,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $40,792 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL FEDERATION OF FILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOC: $40,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetNEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY: $36,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSikh American Legal Defense & Education: $31,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCASA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $15,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC25.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Windward Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Center · Center for Community Change · Weissberg Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc · Working Families Organization Inc · United States Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia New Majority Education Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia New Majority Education Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Virginia New Majority Education Fund?

Find your warmest path to Virginia New Majority Education Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Virginia New Majority Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph