Skip to content

· Private foundation

Virginia Clay Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.9MEducation$3.8MFood & Nutrition$595kArts & Culture$594kHousing & Shelter$355kHuman Services$116kYouth Development$61kCommunity Improvement$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS$150,000
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES FOUNDATION$150,000
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$150,000
TCU NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$100,000
TCU HARRIS COLLEGE OF NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES$100,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$50,000
KIMBELL ART MUSEUM$50,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSIONS OF TARRANT CITY$50,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FW$50,000
DAY RESOURCE CENTER$50,000
MODERN ART MUSEUM$50,000
LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Gladney Center for Adoption: $15k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $10k → 11%Gladney Center for Adoption: $5k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 11%Lena Pope Home: $5k → 11%HOPE FARM: $50k → 11%HOPE FARM: $6k → 11%HOPE Farms: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 26 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
11

Total granted

$9.1M
$350k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+24%

Still filing today

38%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +88%
  • TH
    Texas Health Resources Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $900k · revenue +64%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2025 · $385k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • AS
    All Saints Health Foundation Baylor Scott & White
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • TN
    THE NET FW INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +449%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
2
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
3
Youth and Family Alliance

Youth and family alliance (dba lifeworks) is a fearless advocate for youth and young adults pursuing a life they love and a stable future for themselves and their families. we strive to break cycles of instability by providing support and…

Human Services
4
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
5
Lone Star Circle of Care

Lone star circle of care provides exceptional and accessible patient centered healthcare for our texas neighbors, focusing on the underserved.

Health
6
Youth Center of Texas Inc

Youth center of texas, inc mission is to provide the holistic support needed to restore each survivor's (female identifying survivors of child sex trafficking and commercial exploitation, ages 18-22 and their babies) growth into a life…

—
7
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
8
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
9
Southern Sector Health Initiative

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Safehaven of Tarrant County

The mission of safehaven of tarrant county is to end domestic violence through safety, support, prevention and social change.

Human Services
11
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
12
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center of Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rivertree Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $967,500 · OtherCOOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONTCU Neeley School of Business: $800,000 · OtherTCU Neeley School of BusinessUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS: $600,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON COLLEGE OF BUSINESSUniversity of Texas at Arlington College of Bus: $450,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas at Arlington College of BusTCU HARRIS COLLEGE OF NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES: $450,000 · OtherTCU HARRIS COLLEGE OF NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCESKimbell Art Museum: $390,000 · OtherKimbell Art MuseumTarrant Area Food Bank: $385,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $350,000 · OtherUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant CountyLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $339,000 · OtherCook Children's Medical Center Foundation: $295,000 · OtherTCU Harris College of Nursing & Health Science: $250,000 · Other+17 more: $1,240,500 · Other+17 moreSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $1,750,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN …Texas Health Resources Foundation: $900,000 · HealthTexas Healt…FORT WORTH CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $40,000 · Health+1 more: $26,000 · HealthHOPE FARM INC: $61,000 · Human ServicesTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $35,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $91,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE NET FW INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementDAY RESOURCE CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,517,000Education$1,750,000Health$966,000Human Services$101,000Youth Development$91,000Community Improvement$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $1,750,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $900,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $385,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $350,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $91,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $61,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFORT WORTH CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NET FW INC: $30,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LADDER ALLIANCE: $22,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAY RESOURCE CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENVOY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds THE NET FW INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LADDER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds DAY RESOURCE CENTER FOR HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds ENVOY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · United Way of Tarrant County · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · The Roach Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Martha Sue Parr Trust Xxxxx6005

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia Clay Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia Clay Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Virginia Clay Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Virginia Clay Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Virginia Clay’s filings →

    More from the funding graph