Skip to content

· Private foundation

Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$326kArts & Culture$174kYouth Development$135kEducation$113kHealth$94kHousing & Shelter$50kHuman Services$21kCrime & Legal$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPIC DISCOVERY CENTER$85,000
GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM$10,000
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF$10,000
PROJECT HUNGER INC$5,000
YMCA OF GRAND ISLAND$5,000
CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON$3,750
HALL COUNTY LEADERSHIP UNLIMITED$1,440
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 96%.

Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$668k · 16 repeat orgs$313k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$668k
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+36%

Still filing today

25%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STUHR MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $163k
  • HU
    HEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue -4%
  • GF
    GIPS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $70k

Funded once

  • GF
    GICC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • FL
    FIRST LIGHT CHILD ADVOCACY
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hastings Catholic Education Found

The foundation's mission is to encourage, promote and foster catholic education in hastings, minnesota and surrounding communities.

Religion
2
Adams Central Schools Foundation

The adams central schools foundation seeks to obtain resources to increase the ability of the school to meet the varied needs and interests of the students while insuring their success. the foundation operates on a not-for-profit basis,…

—
3
The Central High School Foundation

The central high school foundation was established in 1996 to provide support for present and future central high school students to ensure the tradition of excellence continues. contributions of time, energy, and resources are essential…

Education
4
Hartington Foundation Inc

Improving the hartington community.

Community Improvement
5
Western Christian High School Found

Western christian high school foundation primary purpose is to support the christian education and instruction of high school students as provided by western christian high school in hull, iowa.

Education
6
Centennial Area Education Foundation

To provide scholarships and educational grants to the area served by the centennial school district #12.

Education
7
Heartland Lutheran High School Foundation

Provide tuition assistance

Education
8
Heartland Foundation

Provide education to students with special needs.

Education
9
Hayden Catholic High School Foundation

To provide long term financial stability of endowed resources and planned gifts, and to further develop those resources in support of hayden catholic high school's efforts to provide the highest quality christian-based secondary education…

—
10
Omaha North High School Foundation

The mission of the omaha north high school foundation is to provide monetary scholarships to graduating senior students in order for them to pursue higher education and to improve educational opportunities for all students at omaha north…

Education
11
Wahoo Public Schools Foundation

Foundation organized for charitable purposes to support wahoo, ne public schools, and the primary activity is to award scholarships to graduates of wahoo public schools.

—
12
Harlan County Community Foundation

To facilitate contributions to local educational governmental and charitable organizations for the betterment of Harlan County Nebraska.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ffa Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STUHR MUSEUM: $162,500 · OtherSTUHR MUSEUMGICC FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherGICC FOUNDATIONEPIC DISCOVERY CENTER: $85,000 · OtherEPIC DISCOVERY CENTERGIPS FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherGIPS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $57,670 · OtherCENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherGREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY: $31,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF: $27,800 · Other+17 more: $127,575 · Other+17 moreLEXINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyLEXINGTON COMMUNITY …HEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC: $98,500 · PhilanthropyHEARTLAND UNITED WAY…CENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $26,000 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationLITERACY COUNCIL OF GRAND ISLAND INC: $9,795 · EducationFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $11,000 · Human ServicesANGELS AMONG US: $5,000 · HealthPROJECT HUNGER: $5,000 · Community ImprovementNational FFA Foundation Inc: $4,720 · Youth Development
Other$806,545Philanthropy$198,500Education$50,795Human Services$11,000Health$5,000Community Improvement$5,000Youth Development$4,720

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEXINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC: $98,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $57,670 over 2y, 20% of budgetCENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF GRAND ISLAND INC: $9,795 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetANGELS AMONG US: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT HUNGER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $4,720 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHALL COUNTY LEADERSHIP UNLIMITED INC: $1,440 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEXINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF GRAND ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS AMONG US ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds National FFA Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HALL COUNTY LEADERSHIP UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Grand Island Community FoundationNE17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust · Edgar & Frances Reynolds Foundation Inc · Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw · Mdm Foundation · The Chief Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Virgil Eihusen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph