How much did SN BUD AND GLORIA WOLBACH CHARITABLE FOUNDATI grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of SN BUD AND GLORIA WOLBACH CHARITABLE FOUNDATI’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

hall

2019

humane

2020

—

2021

hall

2022

—

2023

wood riverhall

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $20k
$10k–50k15 grants · $279k
$50k–250k2 grants · $161k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

HEARTLAND UNITED WAY$85,000
GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO$76,000
GRAND ISLAND CHILDRENS MUSEUM$41,000
STUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION$35,000
PROJECT HUNGER INC$25,000
GRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$24,800
CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$23,000
GRACE FOUNDATION$20,000
GRAND ISLAND HOMETOWN HEROES$20,000
NEBRASKA STATE FAIR PARK FOUNDATION$20,000
WOOD RIVER VISION 2020 INC$10,000
HOPE HARBOR INC$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS-SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA$10,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
MAKE A WISH OF NEBRASKA$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.1M · 38 repeat orgs$380k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.1M

$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

-1%

Still filing today

61%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SM
STUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +149%
GI
GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
5× · 2017–2021 · $212k · revenue +173%
GF
GRACE FOUNDATION
7× · 2017–2024 · $93k · revenue +114%

Funded once

BT
BOYS TOWN CENTRAL NEBRASKA
one grant, 2018 · $50k
GI
GRAND ISLAND SKEET AND SPORTING CLAY
one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -99%
GI
GRAND ISLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2019 · $31k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Central Nebraska Growth Foundation

To engage in economic development acivities and to engage in other activities and programs to benefit and support the grand island area economic development corporation or preform or carry out the functions or purposes of the corporation…

Community Improvement

Grand Rapids Area Community

Inspire individuals and organizations to invest in their community to improve the quality of life.

Community Improvement

Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal

Door County Community Foundation Inc

Inspiring people to give back to sustain and advance the community we love.

Philanthropy

Heartland Lakes Development Commiss

Inspire and retain economic growth

Community Improvement

Hastings Community Foundation Inc

Community foundation

Philanthropy

Grant County Community Foundation Incorporated

To preserve local wealth and enrich the local area

Philanthropy

Community Foundation of Grand Forks

To connect people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy

Iowa Great Lakes Chamber of Commerce

To advance tourism, assist in new and existing business development and promote economic, professional, cultural and civic interests in the iowa great lakes area.

—

Harlan County Community Foundation

To facilitate contributions to local educational governmental and charitable organizations for the betterment of Harlan County Nebraska.

—

Community Action of Nebraska Inc

To alleviate poverty and build the capacity of nebraska's community action agencies.

Community Improvement

Nebraska Corn Growers Association

To promote corn and corn products

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Island Area Clean Community and the most unlike its peers is Wood River Vision 2020. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 32. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 11% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 4% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/37

the rest of the field

18/424

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

31/32

Grantees still filing

20/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,658,071Philanthropy$876,787Education$538,075Community Improvement$162,500Arts & Culture$96,000Recreation & Sports$80,000Animals$61,240

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Grand Island CommunityNE50.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Grand Island Community · Edgar & Frances Reynolds · Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust · The Sherwood Foundation · Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw · Nebraska Community Foundation · Fred & Amanda Glade Foundation · Heartland United Way Inc · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Kaufmann-Cummings Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SN BUD AND GLORIA WOLBACH CHARITABLE FOUNDATI funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PROJECT HUNGER INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 363807298 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PROJECT HUNGER INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati?

Find your warmest path to Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SN BUD AND GLORIA WOLBACH CHARITABLE FOUNDATI

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati?

More from the funding graph

SN BUD AND GLORIA WOLBACH CHARITABLE FOUNDATI

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati?

More from the funding graph