How much did VIRGIL EIHUSEN FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of VIRGIL EIHUSEN FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

grand

2021

—

2022

capital improvementsgrand

2023

—

2024

—

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k4 grants · $15k
$10k–50k4 grants · $41k
$50k–250k1 grant · $85k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

EPIC DISCOVERY CENTER$85,000
GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY$11,000
GO BIG GIVE$10,000
TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM$10,000
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF$10,000
YMCA OF GRAND ISLAND$5,000
PROJECT HUNGER INC$5,000
CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON$3,750
HALL COUNTY LEADERSHIP UNLIMITED$1,440

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 14%. 0% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$635k · 15 repeat orgs$350k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$635k

$259k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%

+49%

Still filing today

40%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GG
GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY
2× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +173%
CC
CENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUND
2× · 2018–2020 · $26k · revenue +569%
CN
CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON
2× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +16%

Funded once

GF
GICC FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $100k
CE
CENTURA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $32k
CE
CENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

North Central State College Foundation

The mission of the North Central State Foundation is to assist the College in providing life long learning opportunities by securing financial and community support.

—

The Central High School Foundation

Central high school foundation was formed in june, 1996, for the primary purose of providing scholarships for students of central high school in omaha, nebraska, and to provide other support to central high school through various…

Education

Centennial Area Education Foundation

To provide scholarships and educational grants to the area served by the centennial school district #12.

Education

Hastings Catholic Education Found

The foundation's mission is to encourage, promote and foster catholic education in hastings, minnesota and surrounding communities.

Religion

Adams Central Schools Foundation

To support the public schools operated by the board of education of the adams central public schools district in adams county, nebraska, through funding of program development and implementation, staff development, and in-service…

—

Central Community College Foundation in

Provide monetary and advisory support for central community college

Education

Harlan County Community Foundation

To facilitate contributions to local educational governmental and charitable organizations for the betterment of Harlan County Nebraska.

—

Holland Public Schools Educ Found

The holland educational foundation works to improve the educational experience of hps students and staff by providing funding for equitable programs, fostering community collaboration, and embracing district advocacy.

—

Foundation for Central Schools

The mission of the Foundation for Central Schools is to support student development by encouraging community investment and involvement in our four pillars of academics, athletics, agriculture and the arts.

Education

Central Nebraska Growth Foundation

To engage in economic development acivities and to engage in other activities and programs to benefit and support the grand island area economic development corporation or preform or carry out the functions or purposes of the corporation…

Community Improvement

North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy

Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ffa Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Central Nebraska Council On. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

8/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$717,695Philanthropy$211,000Education$41,000Health$6,065Community Improvement$5,000Youth Development$4,720

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Grand Island CommunityNE22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Grand Island Community · The Chief Foundation Inc · Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation VIRGIL EIHUSEN FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 470703955 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

VIRGIL EIHUSEN FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

VIRGIL EIHUSEN FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph