· Private foundation
Viragh Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of Viragh Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k25 grants · $714k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACCESS Academies | $400,000 |
| California Institute of Integral St | $166,333 |
| Don Bosco Cristo Rey High School | $130,000 |
| Huckleberry Youth Programs | $100,000 |
| Access Institute for Psychological | $100,000 |
| Crittenton Services of Greater Wash | $85,000 |
| Crittenton Services of Greater Wash | $75,000 |
| Ready Readers | $75,000 |
| Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service | $75,000 |
| Dream Builders Foundation | $70,000 |
| Northern Nevada Literacy Council | $60,000 |
| St Louis Crisis Nursery | $55,800 |
| Temperance Training Foundation | $54,500 |
| Turn the Page STL | $50,000 |
| Doc's Recovery House | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
72 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $494k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAACCESS ACADEMIES8× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +7% · 30% of their budget
- JPJEREMIAH PROGRAM5× · 2019–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +118%
- RRREADY READERS8× · 2017–2025 · $830k · revenue +203%
Funded once
- TGTHE GREEN HOUSE VENTUREgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +125% · 42% of their budget
- MSMost Sacred Heart Catholic Church Eone grant, 2019 · $200k
- SPST PATRICK CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
Rod's house builds authentic connections with young people, supports them in feeling respected and secure in who they are, empowers them to reach their full potential, and positively connects them to the community. rod's house envisions an…
Association house's mission is to advance each person's full participation in the life of their families, communities, and society. since 1899, we have served a vibrant, multicultural community. we used a trauma informed, culturally…
To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.
Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.
Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.
We stabilize people during crisis and transition, build a foundation where people can thrive, and preserve dignity and respect for the most vulnerable.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery and the most unlike its peers is Mind Set Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACCESS ACADEMIES ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds READY READERS ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF INTEGRAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds THE 1701 GROUP FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS ↗
- Who funds DREAMBUILDERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Performing Arts Workshop Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW FUTURES ↗
- Who funds City Kids to Wilderness Project Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Northern Nevada Literacy Council ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN HOUSE VENTURE ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC ↗
- Who funds La Casa de las Madres ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TLC - The Treatment & Learning Centers ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Pott Foundation · The Skip Viragh Foundation Inc · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Norman J Stupp Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Viragh Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Meals On Wheels Plus of Manatee Inc — 0% of income from government
- Temperance Training Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Viragh Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Viragh Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.