Skip to content

· Private foundation

Violet Hampton Tuw #2

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$541kScience & Tech$4kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$785k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE$14,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$4,000
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$4,000
EAST TN UNIVERSITY$4,000
LEE UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA$2,000
ALABAMA A AND M UNIVERSITY$2,000
AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$2,000
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$2,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$2,000
CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$2,000
LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%ALABAMA A AND M UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA: $2k → 12%LEE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%BELMONT UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%EAST TN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS: $2k → 17%MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%BERRY COLLEGE: $2k → 15%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $4k → 18%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA: $2k → 12%LEE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%EAST TN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%RHODES COLLEGE: $2k → 17%TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $4k → 18%BELMONT UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$485k · 45 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
12

Total granted

$485k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+49%

Still filing today

36%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +26%
  • MU
    MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +48%
  • BU
    Belmont University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TU
    THE UNVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • ET
    EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
4
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
5
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
6
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
7
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
10
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the South; the most unlike its peers is Columbia International University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
22/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE: $120,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLEUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLETENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIV: $28,000 · OtherTENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEEUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $24,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS: $19,000 · OtherMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $16,500 · OtherVOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15,000 · Other+36 more: $155,000 · Other+36 moreMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationMILLIGAN UNIVERSITYBelmont University: $8,000 · EducationBelmont UniversityVanderbilt University: $7,500 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $6,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institut…Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $6,000 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic…BRYAN COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationBRYAN COLLEGEMARYVILLE COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationMARYVILLE COLLEGERhodes College: $6,000 · EducationRhodes CollegeBERRY COLLEGE INC: $6,000 · EducationBERRY COLLEGE INCEmory University: $4,500 · EducationColorado Christian University: $4,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,500 · EducationWheaton College: $4,500 · EducationCHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $4,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,750 · Education+6 more: $15,500 · Education+6 more
Other$437,500Education$109,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRYAN COLLEGE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARYVILLE COLLEGE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONVERSE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds BRYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MARYVILLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Rhodes College ↗
  • Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Educational Funding of the South Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Violet Hampton Tuw #2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Violet Hampton Tuw #2. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 26% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Violet Hampton Tuw #2?

Find your warmest path to Violet Hampton Tuw #2 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Violet Hampton Tuw #2’s filings →

More from the funding graph