Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vinck Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$26kCivil Rights$25kReligion$14kSocial Science$8kHealth$7kPhilanthropy$2kHuman Services$500Arts & Culture$500
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$295k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISES INSTITUTE$3,500
RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL$2,000
SAINT LAWRENCE SEMINARY$2,000
CHARLEMAGNE INSTITUTE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JASON FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
OR
SD
IN
CT
CO
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 7 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$59k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
+18%

Still filing today

43%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NAATP FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k
  • RC
    RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL
    5× · 2018–2024 · $8k
  • PO
    PROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN ORDER
    5× · 2018–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
10
National Civil Justice Institute

The objectives and goals of the institute shall be to receive and administer funds for the purpose of providing and supporting educational programs for lawyers, legal academics, and members of the judiciary, conferences and publications…

—
11
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
12
American College of Health Care Administrators

The american college of health care administrators (achca) is the catalyst for excellence in post-acute and aging services leadership.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAATP FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherNAATP FOUNDATIONRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $8,000 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOLPROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN ORDER: $8,000 · OtherPROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN ORDERLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $7,500 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INCSISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $3,350 · OtherSISTERS OF ST BENEDICTMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $2,500 · Other+4 more: $5,000 · Other+4 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEThe Charlemagne Institute: $6,000 · EducationThe Charlemagne Instit…ST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationST JOHN'S COLLEGEALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationALPHA PHI FOUNDATION I…PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthTHE JASON FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFOOTHILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyELDERHEART INC: $500 · Arts & CultureSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $500 · Religion
Other$61,850Education$16,500Health$1,500Human Services$1,000Philanthropy$1,000Arts & Culture$500Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charlemagne Institute: $6,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JASON FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELDERHEART INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Charlemagne Institute ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JASON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHEART INC ↗
  • Who funds Support Our Aging Religious Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vinck Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vinck Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • St John's College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vinck Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph