· Public charity
Village Improvement Association of Doylestown
The VIA mission is to enhance the health and well-being of Central Bucks County and surrounding communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $225,860 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $346,474 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $120,614 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $188k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOYLESTOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION | $188,050 |
| DOYLESTOWN AREA FISH | $13,350 |
| CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA | $7,960 |
| VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE | $6,000 |
| ROXY READING INC | $5,500 |
| DOYLESTOWN FOOD PANTRY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +73% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DHDOYLESTOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +96%
- DADOYLESTOWN AREA FISH9× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +88%
- ASANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC3× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- LVLENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +73%
- NBNEW BRITAIN CIVIC ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of doylestown hospital is to continuously improve the quality of life and proactively advocate for the health and well being of the individuals we serve- see schedule o for additional information. see schedule o for additional…
Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.
Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…
Our mission is to build health and bridge gaps by providing comprehensive, quality healthcare. river valley health is located in the center of williamsport pennsylvania with a branch in lock haven pa. we serve residents of the greater…
The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…
Delaware valley community health (dvch) is a community-governed health care organization providing affordable and accessible primary medical, dental, and behavioral health care. services are provided in a fiscally responsible manner to all…
The mission of the entity is exclusively to support the mission of delaware valley community health, including, without limitation, to hold and develop property for the use and benefit of delaware valley community health.
Rhc's health centers provide comprehensive medical and dental care to individuals throughout northeastern pennsylvania. primary care services include pediatric, adolescent, adult, and geriatric medicine; diagnostic evaluations; treatment…
To provide comprehensive primary and preventive care and social services to medically underserved families and individuals regardless of their ability to pay.
The bridge clinic is a community-minded organization offering full-service, nonprofit veterinary care to bucks county, philadelphia county, parts of new jersey and the surrounding region. our organization is a resource for the community,…
To provide accessible, affordable, and quality health care to all members of our community, regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay.
None
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Doylestown Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Roxy Reading Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DOYLESTOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOYLESTOWN AREA FISH ↗
- Who funds ANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUCKS COUNTY HOUSING GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BRITAIN CIVIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ROXY READING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Village Improvement Association of Doylestown funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.