Skip to content

· Private foundation

Victor and Mary Nelson Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$277k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.3MScience & Tech$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$8,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON$76,500
UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH$39,750
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR$32,250
UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES$26,750
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$22,750
COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC$10,750
BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY$9,500
MICHIGAN TECHOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$8,500
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$8,250
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE$7,500
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$6,500
HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE$6,500
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS$6,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $8k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $6k → 8%HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE: $7k → 12%UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES: $27k → 11%HAMLINE UNIVERISTY: $5k → 14%UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH: $40k → 15%BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 17%MICHIGAN TECHOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS: $6k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER: $7k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $77k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR: $41k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE: $8k → 12%NORTHLAND COLLEGE: $4k → 14%ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO: $8k → 14%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 12%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $8k → 7%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE: $7k → 12%UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES: $19k → 11%HAMLINE UNIVERISTY: $5k → 14%UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH: $35k → 15%MICHIGAN TECHOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS: $6k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $43k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR: $32k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE: $7k → 12%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO: $8k → 14%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $23k → 12%COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $11k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $5k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
CO
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$484k · 14 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$484k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-19%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
    2× · 2024–2025 · $120k
  • UO
    UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $74k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $74k · revenue 0% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • NC
    NORTHLAND COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -19%
  • AS
    ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
6
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
7
The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College

Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…

Education
8
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
9
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
10
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hampshire College Trustees; the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin-Superior Alumni Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $119,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISONUNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH: $74,250 · OtherUNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA DULUTHUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC: $73,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOCNORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $48,000 · OtherNORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES: $46,000 · OtherUNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIESMICHIGAN TECHOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $20,500 · Other+8 more: $74,750 · Other+8 moreLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $16,500 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSI…Wellesley College: $16,000 · EducationWellesley Colle…HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $13,000 · EducationHAMPSHIRE COLLE…COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $10,750 · EducationCOLLEGE OF ST S…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,500 · EducationPresident and F…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $6,000 · EducationMassachusetts I…NORTHLAND COLLEGE: $3,500 · Education
Other$456,750Education$73,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC: $73,500 over 2y, 64% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $10,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank & Susan Huettner Educ FdNJ14.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank & Susan Huettner Educ Fd · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Culver's Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Victor and Mary Nelson Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Victor and Mary Nelson Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Victor and Mary Nelson Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph